Search for: "In re Application of Her Majesty The Queen"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2022, 1:19 pm
They do object to the requirements in Schedule 5 of the Constitution Act, 1867 (CA, 1867), which reads as follows: I A.B. do swear, That I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 6:59 pm
Hearing of her death, Creon's son, Haimon, in love with Antigone, commits suicide; Creon's wife, Queen Eurydice despondent after news of her son's death, also kills herself, leaving Creon to relish the majesty of law(s). [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:44 am
However, Council officers were unaware of the re-burial in 2015. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:34 am
However, Council officers were unaware of the re-burial in 2015. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 1:45 am
However, Council officers were unaware of the re-burial in 2015. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:30 am
The Canterbury Cross is awarded for “outstanding service to the Church of England” and was given to the Queen in recognition and gratitude for Her Majesty’s “unstinting support of the Church throughout her reign” and to mark her Platinum Jubilee year; a specially cast version was made for Her Majesty with platinum inserts in honour of the Platinum Jubilee. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm
On 18 May 2022, the actor and Reclaim Party founder Laurence Fox’s application for a trial by jury in his ongoing defamation litigation was refused by Nicklin J (Blake & Ors v Fox (Re Trial by Jury) [2022] EWHC 1124 (QB)). [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
The same blog has also published an article on the recent decisions in The Queen on the application of Privacy International v Investigatory Powers Tribunal [2022] EWHC 770 QB and Her Majesty’s Attorney General for England and Wales v British Broadcasting Corporation [2022] EWHC 826 (QB), on the topic of closed judgments. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:25 pm
The most recent additions were made in 2002 and are, respectively, the wills of Her late Majesty Queen Elizabeth, The Queen Mother and Her late Royal Highness The Princess Margaret, Countess of Snowdon. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Feeney v Her Majesty the Queen in the Right of Alberta, 2021 ABCA 255 (CanLII) [20] If the Court finds that the litigant has persistently engaged in one or more of the types of behaviour listed in s 23(2), it may issue a vexatious litigant order (as set out in s 23.1) but it does not have to. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Criminal Law: Constitutionality Re Parole IneligibilityAttorney General of Québec and Her Majesty the Queen v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 11:03 am
As noted earlier in these reasons, the appropriate application of accumulated wisdom and inappropriate intrusion of judicial stereotyping is a fine line” that in this case, left the decision open to review (SCJ, para. 24). [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
On the other side of the debate, the appellant, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of New Brunswick (“the Crown”), argues that s. 121 was only intended to dismantle the power to impose tariffs or tariff-like charges at provincial boundaries. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:26 am
Anson v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 30 April 2015. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:00 am
Anson v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 30 April 2015. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:13 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
So therefore, don’t go thinking that any three reports, like those above, and law society presidents’ and treasurers’ letters, mean: (1) that the law societies pick their facts to suit their published conclusions; and, (2) although they may be good at re-structuring, they are not so good at putting anything like a substantive innovation aimed at a solution, into their re-structured [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 4:54 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
