Search for: "In re Application of Her Majesty The Queen" Results 41 - 44 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2022, 1:19 pm by Patricia Hughes
They do object to the requirements in Schedule 5 of the Constitution Act, 1867 (CA, 1867), which reads as follows: I A.B. do swear, That I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The same blog has also published an article on the recent decisions in The Queen on the application of Privacy International v Investigatory Powers Tribunal [2022] EWHC 770 QB and Her Majesty’s Attorney General for England and Wales v British Broadcasting Corporation [2022] EWHC 826 (QB), on the topic of closed judgments. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Simon Lester
On the other side of the debate, the appellant, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of New Brunswick (“the Crown”), argues that s. 121  was only intended to dismantle the power to impose tariffs or tariff-like charges at provincial boundaries. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:40 am by Randy Barnett
They may sometimes rise in quiet and stately majesty, and inundate the land, refreshing and fertilizing the earth with their mysterious properties. [read post]