Search for: "In re Charter Communications, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2015, 4:01 pm
It’s all fine with us, and we're abandoning our trade mark registrations to show good faith in this regard. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:03 am
  In re Charter Communications, Inc., Securities Litig., 443 F.3d 987 (8th Cir. 2006). [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:21 am
“That means meaningful metrics that are measured, of relevance to stakeholders and assurance of the numbers so you’re not gaming the metrics. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 10:58 am by Patrick T. Ryan
Charter Communications, Inc., 836 F.3d 925 (8th Cir. 2016) (alleged violations of Cable Communication Policy Act did not suffice to confer standing because they involved no concrete harm to the plaintiff). [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:56 am by Jay McDaniel
Cir. 2003) and In re Charter Communications, Inc., 393 F.3d 771 (8th Cir. 2005). [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 10:00 am
The Facts and the Theory     In the suit, Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC ("petitioners"), alleged that Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., and Motorola, Inc. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 4:14 pm by John Jascob
Blue Apron Holdings, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court held that a company’s charter provisions requiring Securities Act claims to be brought in federal court were facially valid under Delaware law. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:06 am by Susan Brenner
The Charter Communications documents indicate that. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 12:40 am by Eleonora Rosati
International – Compagnia Generale Distribuzione s.p.a. v Zorro Productions Inc.).In delivering its new judgment in the long-running (15+ years and counting!) [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 12:08 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKBusiness Law Securities Fraud Claims Alleging Proxy Statement Omissions Dismissed for Failure to State Claim In re Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 7:24 am
Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of CanadaCopyright law: At issue is whether a video game download that includes music fits under the Copyright Board of Canada’s 2007 decision regarding royalties for communication to the public of musical works.Dec. 6 — Federal Court — Rogers Communications Inc. v. [read post]