Search for: "In the Matter of Application for Special Temporary Admission" Results 101 - 120 of 158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2013, 8:58 am by Kathryn Fenderson Scott
(4) The enforcing authority may request that an individual who refuses to comply with a subpoena on the ground that testimony or matter may incriminate him or her be ordered by the court to provide the testimony or matter. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
We considered the theories under which government is organized and their application to the United States, the development of a hierarchy of law, its relation to the law developed in international for a, and then considered the issue of legal integrity through the notion of “rule of law” as a political and juridical concept. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Additional flexibility is provided by Article 2(3), which provides that an offense shall be considered an extraditable offense: (1) whether or not the laws in the Contracting States place the offense within the same category of offenses or describe the offense by the same terminology; or (2) whether or not the offense is one for which United States federal law requires the showing of such matters as interstate transportation or use of the mails or of other facilities affecting interstate or… [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Additional flexibility is provided by Article 2(3), which provides that an offense shall be considered an extraditable offense: whether or not the laws in the Contracting States place the offense within the same category of offenses or describe the offense by the same terminology; or whether or not the offense is one for which United States federal law requires the showing of such matters as interstate transportation or use of the mails or of other facilities affecting interstate or foreign… [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
In keeping with most recently negotiated U.S. extradition treaties, Article 2(3) further provides that in determining whether an offense is an offense under the law of the requested State, the conduct of the person shall be examined by taking into account the totality of the conduct alleged against the person, and will be considered an extraditable offense: whether or not the laws in the Contracting States place the offense within the same category of offenses or describe the offense by the same… [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 4:33 pm
To register, send the following information to publications@nycap.rr.com Your name and e-mail address The name of your organizations and its mailing address Your telephone number The purchase order number for your order if your organization requires one Instructions concerning your registration will be then e-mailed to you.Topics covered in New York Public Personnel Law since April 1, 2008 [click on title to go to summary]A provisional employees right to a permanent appointment is limited … [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Requesting State shall be notified without delay of the disposition of its application and the reasons for any denial. 4. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Requesting State shall be notified without delay of the disposition of its application and the reasons for any denial. 4. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Additional flexibility is provided by Article 2(3), which provides that an offense shall be considered an extraditable offense: (1) whether or not the laws in the Contracting States place the offense within the same category of offenses or describe the offense by the same terminology; or (2) whether or not the offense is one for which United States federal law requires the proof of such matters as interstate transportation or use of the mails or of other facilities affecting interstate or… [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:40 pm
These principles apply, not merely in the award of costs, but also in the award of extra allowance or special costs. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Upon entry into force, it would supersede (with the exception noted below) the Extradition Treaty between the United States and Great Britain signed at London on December 22, 1931, entered into force on June 24, 1935, and made applicable to India from March 9, 1942. [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:30 am by Josh Blackman
But when the Secretary deems it necessary, he can adopt special procedures for issuing visas that take into consideration nationality. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
The judge may properly receive only admissible evidence but need not permit a party to introduce all admissible evi ­dence. [read post]
10 May 2018, 3:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The defense presents a very different picture that notwithstanding admissions of Mr. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 10:33 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
As the U.K. government prepares itself for the beginning of Brexit negotiations in March 2017, it is becoming increasingly clear that there is no off-ramp—and, for that matter, no brakes on the car. [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This provision was included in the Treaty at the instance of the U.S. delegation in response to concerns over due process before special terrorism tribunals in Peru. [read post]