Search for: "Ingersoll-Rand" Results 61 - 74 of 74
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2014, 8:02 am
General Counsel & Chief IP Officer, Ingersoll Rand; Kevin Erdman (Partner, Reichel IP), Prof. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:48 am by Richard Renner
Ingersoll-Rand Hussman, ARB No. 11-075, ALJ No. 2011-CER-1 (ARB Sept. 13, 2012), the ARB affirmed a dismissal of a blacklising claim because it missed the 30-day time limit. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 1:05 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Plaintiffs were suing an Irish company called Ingersoll-Rand, an industrial manufacturing company, alleging their father’s exposure to the deadly fibers occurred when he worked as a civilian marine machinist for the U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 1:05 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Plaintiffs were suing an Irish company called Ingersoll-Rand, an industrial manufacturing company, alleging their father’s exposure to the deadly fibers occurred when he worked as a civilian marine machinist for the U.S. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 7:47 am
Four "say on pay" proposals received majority backing--the most recent winning 57 percent of votes cast at Ingersoll Rand on June 6, according to the proponent, the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:38 am
AFSCME, Walden Asset Management, and public pension funds sent letters to companies like Verizon and Ingersoll-Rand, where "say on pay" proposals received majority support from investors. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
In of the most closely watched issues--the advisory vote on executive pay--Ingersoll-Rand pledged Dec. 18 to discuss the topic with its 25 largest shareholders, according to regulatory filings. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
National Solid Wastes Management Ass'n, 505 U.S. 88, 98-100(1992) (related statutory sections, legislative history, and administrative "contemporaneous interpretation").Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Ingersoll-Rand Co., 14 P.3d 990, 995 (Alaska 2000) (§17); see also Munhoven v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 6:02 am
(Editor's Note: This post is based on a Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP memorandum by Amy Goodman and Gillian McPhee.) [read post]
Editor’s Note: John Olson is a founding partner of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher’s Washington, D.C. office and a visiting professor at the Georgetown Law Center. [read post]