Search for: "Insurance Company X, Y and Z"
Results 41 - 44
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 9:18 pm
Here’s the court’s theory: If a bunch of inframarginal consumers really like products X and Y but not similar-but-slightly-different-and-cheaper product Z, a merger between X and Y would enable the combined firm to gouge the inframarginal consumers, regardless of the effect on the marginal folks. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 11:17 am
Reading the book is the best way to understand why Solove doesn't just say "do more 'x'," or "make 'y' illegal on the Internet," or "tech people about how to do 'z'," but Solove's reasoned reluctance to throw out lots of solutions (and the nuance of the few ideas he does suggest) seem to be the main sticking point with reviewers so far. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 1:00 am
For example, if a policyholder believes she has been cheated out of homeowners insurance money by Company X, does that person really think that companies Y and Z are much better? [read post]
