Search for: "Invention Submission Corporation" Results 61 - 80 of 259
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2007, 8:29 am
A patent also may not be issued if the claimed invention was described in a patent or patent application by another inventor filed prior to the filing date of the claimed invention. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 12:20 pm by Dennis Crouch
Soon after Couzzo's case was filed, the USPTO went after the Invention Submission Corporation as a scam. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 8:47 am by jeffreynewmanadmin
In addition, Schena oversaw an illegal kickback and health care fraud scheme that resulted in the submission of over $77 million in claims for COVID-19 and allergy testing. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am by Jelle Hoekstra
No declaration as to the applicants' entitlement, at the international filing date, to claim the priority of the earlier application (see Box VIII(iii) of Form PCT/RO/101) was submitted upon or after the filing of the subsequent application.Patent assignment agreement D19 [hereinafter referred to as "Agreement"] between Tenaris Connections·BV, a corporation organised and existing under the laws of the Netherlands (assignor), and Tenaris·Connections AG, a… [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:33 am by Vincent LoTempio
How does the inventor protect an invention? [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:02 am
The court takes judicial notice of the fact that the world wide web was invented by Tim Berners-Lee back in 1989; he wrote the first web browser in 1990. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 10:31 am by USPTO
To determine whether an invention is patentable, a patent examiner must evaluate it in light of the state-of-the-art. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:09 pm by Gene Quinn
The individual will review invention disclosure submissions, consult key stakeholders to determine the best filing strategy, prosecute and, where necessary, manage prosecution by outside patent counsel in support of that strategy. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:15 am by RatnerPrestia
With extensive and diverse legal, technical and corporate expertise, RatnerPrestia’s legal professionals provide practical, cost-effective, business-oriented counseling to a wide range of international and domestic businesses. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 10:29 pm by Shamnad Basheer
For those interested, here is my written submission to Natco's baseless allegations. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:22 am by Jani
This would, through superficial assessment, include Stem Cell Corporation's inventions and therefore prevent them from being patented. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:45 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this blog’s readers. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:43 am by Florian Mueller
The brief is not anti-patent, but it's clearly the kind of submission companies make if they think that minor adjustments are insufficient and fundamental change is needed. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 8:37 pm
Most folks who read this blog know that the following sequence of events is commonly in large corporations with a defined patent procedure: inventor conceives; inventor fills out an invention disclosure form; inventor submits the form; form sits in a queue for review for inhouse counsel; inhouse counsel reviews and approves for drafting; approved disclosure is sent to outside counsel. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this blog’s readers. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 12:33 am by John Collins
The original Epson cartridges vs Calidad’s “repurposed” cartridges The case involved Seiko Epson Corporation’s (Seiko) “EPSON” branded printer cartridges that embodied the invention in two Australian Patents (Seiko Patents). [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 1:26 am
  Prof Shanks' legal team argued that this was essentially a 'too big to pay' submission. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:34 pm by Mike Mireles
  The entry is a debit expense, with no equivalent asset (credit) recognised due to the uncertain future value of the patented invention. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:00 am by Jessica Gutierrez Alm
  The defendants in many of these cases were large corporations—Amazon, Wal-Mart, Petco, Uber, Lululemon, Target, and Netflix. [read post]