Search for: "Inventor Holdings LLC" Results 41 - 60 of 420
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
In a patent case filed in the Eastern District of Texas by Eon Corporation IP Holdings, LLC ("Eon") against Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon"), along with other defendants, Eon moved to dismiss Verizon's inequitable conduct counterclaims and strike its inequitable conduct affirmative defenses. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 10:22 am
Hammond, Indiana - Patent attorneys for Four Mile Bay LLC of Wadsworth, Ohio sued in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Zimmer Holdings, Inc. of Warsaw, Indiana and Zimmer Dental Inc. of Carlsbad, California infringed DENTAL IMPLANT WITH POROUS BODY, Patent No. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 6:21 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Plaintiffs claim that Univar entered into a Letter of Intent with Todd Bloomer, the inventor of the ‘330 Patent, for Univar’s manufacture, marketing, and sale of DSBM in April 2006. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 11:48 pm by Mark Summerfield
  However, the applicant – originally the inventor Robert D Arnott, and subsequently the assignee, Research Affiliates LLC – had filed a divisional application with slightly different claims, and the appeal was placed on-hold pending a decision on this further application. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
But by the 18th century, inventors were busy in Britain and invention patents came to be seen in a different light. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 1:24 pm by Douglas J. Wood
Technology LLC, is the sole inventor listed on the patents. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 8:46 am by David Kemp
Unlike many patent lawsuits against the technology giants like Apple, this suit stands out as being by the actual inventor of the patent at issue, rather than merely a patent holding company. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 12:00 am
District Court for the Southern District of N.Y. has handed down its decision in Capitol Records, llc. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 7:34 am by Joe Mullin
Enlarge The top US patent court has ordered a patent-holding company with a habit of dismissing cases rather than arguing its case in court to pay its opponent's attorneys fees. [read post]