Search for: "Iovate Health Sciences, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2019, 9:07 am
See Ganeden Biotech, Inc., NAD Case #4863 (June 2008); Park Labs, NAD Case #4935 (Nov. 2008); Imagenetix, Inc., NAD Case #5167 (April 2010); The Andrew Jergens Company, NAD Case #2979 (Oct. 1992); but see Iovate Health Sciences, Inc. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 9:07 am
See Ganeden Biotech, Inc., NAD Case #4863 (June 2008); Park Labs, NAD Case #4935 (Nov. 2008); Imagenetix, Inc., NAD Case #5167 (April 2010); The Andrew Jergens Company, NAD Case #2979 (Oct. 1992); but see Iovate Health Sciences, Inc. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 8:21 am
Iovate Health Sciences, Inc., 2014 WL 197719, at *3 (S.D. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:46 pm
Although they are willing to and have agreed to settle the case, the company behind Hydroxycut, Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:50 am
Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A., Inc., Case No. 1402915 ,filed with the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Barbara.) [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:50 am
Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A., Inc., Case No. 1402915 ,filed with the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Barbara.) [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 3:37 am
Iovate Health Sciences USA, Inc.). [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:48 am
Consumers are urged not to use Hydroxycut products by lovate Health Sciences Inc., of Oakville, Ontario. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:30 pm
The requester apparently located the documents in the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (Library) in Trondheim, Norway. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:16 am
Weight loss claims, like other health claims, require competent and reliable scientific evidence as support, and as we have reported, the FTC recently settled a matter with Iovate Health Sciences. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 5:00 pm
Iovate Health Scis., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:00 am
Begley makes all the high level decisions for Iovate U.S.A., including entering into contracts with retailers, purchasing product from Iovate Health Sciences Inc., and giving instructions to Kuene and Nagel, the independent company that Iovate U.S.A. contracts with for warehousing and distribution of Iovate’s products. . . . [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 11:14 am
District Court to find that the FTC overstepped its authority in defining what constitutes “substantiation” of health-related claims in recent consent agreements with Nestle Healthcare Nutrition, Inc. and Iovate Health Sciences, Inc. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:36 am
Iovate Health Sciences USA, Inc., No. 10-CV-587 (W.D.N.Y. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:41 am
POM alleges that the FTC has put out these new, obligatory advertising standards for the entire food industry not by going through formal rule-making that would give the industry a chance to have input, but simply by publishing consent orders that it entered into with Nestle U.S.A. and Iovate Health Sciences, Inc. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:24 am
(Click here for the complaint) We’ve previously blogged about the new substantiation requirements found in recent consent orders against Nestle U.S.A. and Iovate Health Sciences, Inc. [read post]
9 May 2010, 8:03 pm
About forty other cases have been filed nationwide against a company known as Iovate Health Sciences USA, Inc. and its many parent, sister, and subsidiary companies, thirty four of which are currently pending. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
(GRAY on Claims) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Blocking attorneys from simultaneously litigating and prosecuting patents: In re Deutsche Bank Trust (Patently-O) CAFC: Muscle ad in magazine invalidates patent: Iovate Health Science Inc v Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition Inc (IPKat) (IP Directions) CAFC: If patent troll sends the letter, then a case-or-controversy ‘implicitly’ is asserted: HP v Acceleron (ISinIP) District… [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 12:14 pm
Muscle Ad in Mag invalidates patent Two weeks ago, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld an Eastern District of Texas decision in Iovate Health Science Inc v Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition Inc that a muscle magazine advertisement about a body-building supplement published before the critical date rendered seven of the claims obvious and therefore the patent was invalid. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 7:55 pm
Hawkins maintains that Ontario-based Iovate Health Sciences, Inc., and its subsidiaries and related companies defrauded the public by advertising that Hydroxycut products worked and had no adverse health effects. [read post]
