Search for: "J & C Express L.L.C."
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2017, 1:39 pm
C. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm
Brunetti, the Federal Circuit’s decision was almost certainly correct.[4] Unlike the provisions at issue in those cases, which barred the registration of disparaging, immoral, and scandalous marks, section 1052(c) does not discriminate based on the viewpoint expressed; it bars registration of a famous person’s name whether the mark criticizes praises or is neutral about that person. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
AND J. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
AND J. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
By Philip J. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 am
Pratt, Thomas J. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
See BST Holdings, L.L.C. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm
C-P-354/2013. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
(Boyce, J. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
(Boyce, J. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
Marsh, J. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 6:32 am
One group of five former Commissioners, including former SEC Chairs Richard C. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 6:32 am
One group of five former Commissioners, including former SEC Chairs Richard C. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
P-2009-2542.Ethan J. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
Highway Express, Inc. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
While no meaning is expressed in the America Invents Act, it is instructive to note that under the 2005 Patent Reform Act, a similar term —“publicly known”— appears and was defined in 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
See Tuscan Builders, LP v. 1437 SH6 L.L.C., 438 S.W.3d 717, 721 (Tex. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
He finally expressed his opinion that a guardian ad litem should be entrusted with the authority to decide for S.T. whether the case should be resolved by trial or settlement. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
(c).) [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
P. 38.1(j)._____ Text of brief is not double spaced. [read post]
