Search for: "J & P Holdings LLC" Results 61 - 80 of 557
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
  Enforcement of a Foreign Judgment Action in the Superior Court in Connecticut Seeking to Enforce the California Judgment Default Judgment in California Personal Jurisdiction Due Process Clause Nonsignatory to a Contract Bound by a Forum Selection Clause Contained Therein? [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 4:00 am by R. David Donoghue
CZS Holdings LLC d/b/a Pur360, No. 20 C 6886, Slip Op. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
The counterclaim for defamation was rejected in Musst Holdings v Astra Asset Management [2021] EWHC 3432 (Ch) on the basis that it was not proven that there was a publication as alleged and that the actual or natural and probable requisite loss had not been proven. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm by admin
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, 752 F.3d 82, 89 (1st Cir. 2014) (affirming exclusion of expert witness who failed to account for confounding in event studies), aff’g 853 F. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am by INFORRM
National Institute of Standards and Technology will hold a webinar on 1 December 2021 to help organizations use regulatory crosswalks in implementing its Privacy Framework. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am by Eugene Volokh
University Club reaffirmed the narrowness of the D.C. statute, holding that it doesn't apply to a club's ejecting a member because of his general political beliefs (as opposed to party affiliation).[8] Arboleda v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 6:36 am by Dennis Crouch
 Neapco Holdings LLC, 966 F.3d 1347 (Fed. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 12:59 pm by Emily Dai
The event will be moderated by Michael J. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
 529, 557 (2015). [6] Christopher Yoo, The First Amendment Rights of Common Carriers: Net Neutrality, Privacy, and Beyond (forthcoming 2021), notes cases holding that allowed phone companies some power to block certain uses of their services, chiefly for dial-a-porn. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
[The statute immunizes computer services for "action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict ... availability of material that the provider ... considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected"—but what exactly does that mean?] [read post]
23 May 2021, 7:21 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In Tolofson, at p. 1049 S.C.R., La Forest J. explained the distinction as follows: [The real and substantial connection] test has the effect of preventing a court from unduly entering into matters in which the jurisdiction in which it is located has little interest. [read post]