Search for: "J A Hoffman"
Results 81 - 100
of 492
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2013, 8:05 am
There were four meaty issues for Arnold J to tackle. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 4:46 pm
In an order issued Friday (found here), Souter — in his role as Circuit Justice for the area that includes Maine — sought responses to First Amendment issues raised by the non-party candidate, Herbert J. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 12:52 pm
Hoffman, Jennifer D. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 6:27 am
Ferguson, Partner, BakerHostetler Theodore J. [read post]
31 May 2015, 12:30 am
Here's a list of reviews for this Sunday's reading:H-Net has posted the following--A review of Michael J. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:51 pm
Acting NJ Attorney General John J. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 6:10 am
London: Pinter, 1995.Hoffman, Stanley. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
Arnold J considered the criteria set down by the Court of Appeal in Novartis v Hospira [2013], but noted that it was of concern that Lord Hoffman’s judgment in the Privy Council case National Commercial Bank Jamaica v Olint [2009] had not been cited. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
Ruben J. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
Pincus, the company’s founder and controlling stockholder, and Reid Hoffman, an outside director. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 8:02 pm
“Book publishing is a business and increasingly a technical one, but at its heart it is an art, writes Peter J. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 7:50 pm
Green Bag Volume 15, Number 3 (Spring 2012) EX ANTE Mistakes • Bobble Berring TO THE BAG James J. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 7:00 am
Hoffman, and Ryan J. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:24 am
Montoya Alvarez, 572 U.S. 1, 19 (2014) (Alito, J., concurring); see Hague Convention, art. 12, 19 I.L.M at 1502. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 3:30 am
J. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 3:23 pm
Carefirst of Fort Wayne Inc., d/b/a/ Advanced Healthcare, 13 months after Stephen J. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:20 am
On appeal, novelty was not at issue, with Tristar only arguing that Birss J had erred when assessing inventive step.It is established UK law that inventive step is “a kind of jury question” and that “where the application of a legal standard such as… obviousness involves no question of principle but is simply a matter of degree, an appellate court should be very cautious in differing from the judge’s evaluation” (Lord Hoffman in Biogen v… [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 2:36 pm
Kaklauskas, Francis J., Susan Nimanheminda, Louis Hoffman, and MacAndrew S. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:08 pm
The Supreme Court granted the motions and, on constraint of Hoffman, dismissed the claim for lost wages. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 4:57 pm
FRIEDLANDER, J., concurs. [read post]
