Search for: "J. A. Nicklin"
Results 41 - 60
of 317
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2019, 4:07 pm
The consequences of not doing so are starkly apparent from Nicklin J’s judgment in Poroshenko v BBC [2019] EWHC 213 (QB) handed down on 7 February 2019. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm
The bane and antidote principle was summarised by Nicklin J as follows: “The publication must be read as a whole, and any “bane and antidote” taken together. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:42 pm
Nicklin J (pictured) called it ‘potentially hugely wasteful of costs’ (Morgan v Associated Newspapers Ltd ([2018] EWHC 1850 (QB))) and added that if the court did not agree with the defendant’s proposed meaning, their defence may no longer be viable or require amendment. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am
On 26 to 28 April 2023, Nicklin J heard the trial in the case of MBR Acres Ltd v Free MBR Beagles QB-2021-003094. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 4:14 pm
Nicklin J expressed his disquiet about the costs consequences (discussed below) of failing to take this approach which, in his view, is the consistent way to proceed under the overriding objective. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm
Nicklin J (at [22]) held that meaning (a) was an allegation of fact that was not defamatory at common law. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm
On the same date Nicklin J heard an application in the case of Hewson v Times Newspapers. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
On 16 and 17 October 2023, Steyn J will hear applications in the case of Donald Trump v Orbis Business Intelligence. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
Last Week in the Courts On 4 December 2023, there was a hearing before Nicklin J in the case of Davidoff and others v Brown QB-2020-002760. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm
On 7 February 2019 there was a one day meaning trial in the case of Poroshenko v BBC before Nicklin J. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:30 pm
Nicklin J made a similar order in PML. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 4:18 pm
Julian Knowles J agreed with the assessment of Nicklin J, finding that the allegations were of a very serious nature, taking into account the nature of the messages complained of, the audience of the messages and the scale of publication. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 4:55 pm
On the same day Nicklin J handed down judgment in the case of Bindel v PinkNews Media Group Ltd, [2021] EWHC 1868 (QB) He refused to order the trial of a preliminary issue in a libel case. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm
Nicklin J found that “the defendant clearly considers that he is above the law; that he does not need to comply with orders of the court. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
On 3 February 2021 Nicklin J gave a costs judgment in the case of Santi v Santi. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 4:52 pm
On 21 to 23 April 2021, the trial of the case of Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon was heard by Nicklin J. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:28 am
However, Nicklin J ultimately decided that the local authorities’ injunctions would be discharged against newcomers. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am
Open Democracy Ltd before Nicklin J. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm
The third ground (whether the Court of Appeal was wrong to uphold the findings of Nicklin J) was dependent on the Court’s findings in relation to the first and second grounds. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 4:34 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 1 March 2021 Nicklin J heard closing submissions in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
