Search for: "J. Barclay" Results 101 - 120 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2015, 2:20 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
Shortly before the website went live, the Respondent, “H”, opened two bank accounts, one with Lloyds and the other with Barclays. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
On 6 and 7 May 2020 there was a hearing in the breach of confidence and misuse of private information case of Barclay v Barclay before Warby J. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:15 am by CMS
The Quincecare duty (so called because it was first set out by Steyn J in Barclays Bank plc v Quincecare Ltd [1992] 4 All ER 363) provides that a bank will be liable to its customer in negligence if it makes a payment in circumstances where it had reasonable grounds for believing that the payment instruction was an attempt to misappropriate the funds of its customer. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 12:55 pm
The effect of this was to bypass all the protections contained in the Administration of Justice Acts, something which had been found to be perfectly lawful by the Court of Appeal in Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank [2000] QB 263. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:08 am
Harvard University’s Edmond J. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
The participants in the Roundtable were as follows: Joseph Bachelder Founder and Senior Partner The Bachelder Firm Michal Barzuza Associate Professor of Law University of Virginia School of Law Lucian Bebchuk William J. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 8:44 am
“At many of the big firms, clients end up dealing with a fourth-year associate,” J. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:15 am by Page Perry LLC
The brokerage firms mentioned in the article include Citigroup, Barclays, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 7:54 pm
"If we could just ever spread this out more evenly over the year the year it would be so lovely," says J. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 2:17 pm by luiza
  The $26 billion settlements with J&J and the distributors would resolve claims that the three distributors allegedly failed to fulfill their legal duty to refuse to ship opioids to pharmacies that submitted suspicious drug orders, and that J&J allegedly misled patients and doctors about the addictive nature of opioid drugs. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 2:17 pm by luiza
  The $26 billion settlements with J&J and the distributors would resolve claims that the three distributors allegedly failed to fulfill their legal duty to refuse to ship opioids to pharmacies that submitted suspicious drug orders, and that J&J allegedly misled patients and doctors about the addictive nature of opioid drugs. [read post]