Search for: "J. DOE # 5" Results 1 - 20 of 8,315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2012, 6:10 pm by Kenan Farrell
John Does 1-5 Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-01680-SEB-TABFile Date: Thursday, November 15, 2012Plaintiff: Malibu Media LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
However, the fact that the representative did not make any mistake does not protect his client from the consequences of its own errors or negligence (J 3/93; T 381/93; J 16/93; J 17/03).The argument that the applicant could not have known which time limits [, if not met,] would result in the irrevocable loss of the application is not sufficient for establishing that all due care had been taken. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:11 am
Private ...IPKat readers might remember [here] that a few weeks ago Green J issued a judgment concerning the recently introduced  exception for personal copies for private use (s28B of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 ('CDPA')), notably the fact that such provision does not currently envisage a fair compensation requirement.BASCA, the Musicians' Union, and UK Music filed an application for judicial review against UK… [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 7:38 pm
DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al.CALKINS, J.[ ¶1] John Doe appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Studstrup, J.) granting Evert Fowle, Craig Poulin, and Everett Flannery's motions to dismiss, and dismissing Doe's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Yet, the cited sentence does not allow an interpretation whereby any reason whatsoever, serious or not, would be sufficient for a retraction of the withdrawal. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 8:49 am
J., Jan. 9, 2008, a net worth of $1.4 million will place a person in the top 5% of Americans. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 1:28 am by JP Sarmiento
Moreover, the Ukrainian Embassy does not intend to issue a No Objection statement for our client’s possible J-1 visa waiver. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:46 pm by scanner1
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, and JOHN DOES 1-5, Respondent and Appellee. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 10:41 am by David Adelstein
A new insurance coverage opinion dealing with a commercial general liability’s (CGL) duty to defend involved exclusions commonly known as the (j)(6) and (j)(7) property damage exclusions (and in certain policies known as the (j)(5) and (j)(6) exclusions). [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 12:56 am by Sander van Rijnswou
However, starting at reasons 5 there is a twist in the tale to the benefit of the appellants. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
”[5.5] Turning rather to the substance of the point, as already noted, the decision G 1/09 links the question of whether an application is pending with the existence of “substantive rights” in the patent application.[5.6] Decision J 4/11 dealt in detail with the issue of “substantive rights” in this context:“[5] The question is thus whether substantive rights deriving from the grandparent application were still in existence when the parent… [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 1:00 am by Diane Tweedlie
The appeal in this case was directed to a decision to refuse  a request for re-establishment of the missed period for paying a renewal fee with surcharge. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The refusal of a loan application does not alter the legal situation of the appellant. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:39 am by Roel van Woudenberg
In this respect, the appellant invoked the principle of good faith or protection of legitimate expectations and cited the allegedly pertinent decision J 14/94. [read post]