Search for: "J. DOES 1-5"
Results 41 - 60
of 6,476
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 4:31 pm
(5) Beau J. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This is no longer about figuring out the most sensible reading of statutory language; it is instead about dictating how Congress does its work. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 1:43 pm
Finally, KOSA will be enforced by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) using its authority under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act to guard against “unfair or deceptive acts or practices. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
It follows that in accordance with R 136(1) and (2) the period for paying the third renewal fee and surcharge ended on 23 December 2008.[5] The request for re-establishment of 23 December 2008 does not contain any explicit instructions to the EPO to debit the third renewal fee and surcharge from the European representative’s deposit account with the EPO. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 8:45 am
"Migration, Mobility and Displacement, vol. 5, no. 1 (2020) [open access]- Published by the Centre for Asia-Pacific Initiatives, University of Victoria. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:36 am
Conclude the judge: "M & S has infringed the Trade Marks under Article 5(1)(a) of the Directive and Article 9(1)(a) of the Regulation".Today, the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Lords Justices Patten and Kitchin and Sir Colin Rimer) at [2014] EWCA Civ 1403, this being an appeal against Arnold J's decision in [2013] EWHC 1291 (Ch). [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
Otherwise, the appeal must be rejected as inadmissible under R 101(1).According to A 108, third sentence, “[w]ithin four months of notification of the decision, a statement setting out the grounds of appeal shall be filed in accordance with the Implementing Regulations. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
, 44 Harvard J. of Law & Pub. [read post]
16 May 2018, 6:45 am
Our NY personal injury attorney Christopher J. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Although there are certain parallels between the formal procedures of extension of protection under the Extension Agreements on the one hand and the designation of a contracting state under the EPC on the other hand (A 78(2) and A 79(2) EPC 1973, R 38(1) and R 39(1) EPC), the Extension Agreements form a legal system of their own that is distinct from the legal system created by the EPC. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
For the latest installment, we turn to law professor J. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 7:39 am
Apple Inc., 1-10-cv-00258 (DED September 5, 2013, Order) (Robinson, J.). [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 3:01 pm
A communication under R 108(3) is due from the EPO only in case of loss of rights under paragraph 1 or 2 of that Rule, which does not encompass the lack of payment of the renewal fee in respect of the third year due upon entry into the regional phase under R 107(1)(g). [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
Consequently, it must be stated that the pendency of the parent application ended with the day before the mention of the grant of the European patent in the European Patent Bulletin. [4] It must be added that the above statement of the EBA relates only to the wording of R 25(1) EPC 1973 but it is clear from the further deliberations in the reasons for this decision that the same interpretation also applies to the wording of R 36(1) applicable to the present case. [5] As a… [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:45 pm
Lee, 455 U.S. 252, 263 n.2 (1982) (Stevens, J., concurrence); Id. at 889 n.5; See also Priscilla J. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
Although there are certain parallels between the formal procedures of extension of protection under the Extension Agreements on the one hand and the designation of a contracting state under the EPC on the other hand (A 78(2) and A 79(2) EPC 1973, R 38(1) and R 39(1) EPC), the Extension Agreements form a legal system of their own that is distinct from the legal system created by the EPC. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 7:46 am
On 5 December 2019 the Receiving Section issued the decision under appeal.VIII. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 11:01 am
J 4/97, J 12/03, J 25/03, J 14/04, J 7/06, J 8/06). [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 5:51 am
Immunol. [1971] 1:242; and J. [read post]
21 May 2012, 5:01 pm
The application documents filed with the EPO contained, apart from the claims and the abstract, description pages 1 to 15 and a set of drawings, comprising Fig. 1 to Fig. 12. [read post]
