Search for: "J. DOES 1-5" Results 81 - 100 of 6,477
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2012, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendant also failed to seek information as to prior similar incidents in the area which would be relevant to foreseeability (fa. at 5 8 ) . [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:54 am
As regards the meaning of "pending application" in R 25(1) EPC 1973, one interpretation is given in the Information from the EPO (OJ EPO 2002, 112). [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 8:03 pm by Ray Dowd
Johnson, Esq., Partner, Winston & Strawn LLP  1:15-2:05 p.m.CLE 3B - IP: Cease and Desist Letters: Ethics & PracticeRaymond J. [read post]
21 May 2018, 4:16 pm by Mark D. Harley
  The proposed change would affect those individuals and their dependents in the following statuses:  Student (F-1 Academic Student and F-2 Spouse or Child of F-1 nonimmigrant); Exchange Visitor (J-1 Exchange Visitor and J-2 Spouse or Child of J-1 nonimmigrant); and Vocational Student (M-1 Vocational Student or non-academic Student and M-2 Spouse or Child of M-1 nonimmigrant). [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As a consequence, the LBA considers that it has to examine its competence.[4] The impugned decision does not explicitly mention the applicable provisions of the EPC. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The decisive factor here is when the person concerned ought to have noticed the error if he had taken all due care.The representative has conceded that he received the notification of the loss of rights pursuant to R 112(1) on 10 December 2008 […].Receipt of notification under R 112(1) is relevant to the question of when the cause of non-compliance with a time limit is removed. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 6:44 pm
The reciprocal deeds between plaintiff and defendant were both recorded by J on December 18, 1978, while L's deeds to plaintiff, concededly executed on December 1, 1978, were recorded by J on December 5, 1978. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 6:50 pm
The reciprocal deeds between plaintiff and defendant were both recorded by J on December 18, 1978, while L's deeds to plaintiff, concededly executed on December 1, 1978, were recorded by J on December 5, 1978. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The Legal Board of appeal would most certainly be interested in making use of those talents within the framework of the application of A 117 and in particular in hearing the parties (A 117(1)(a)), requesting information (A 117(1)(b)) and hearing witnesses (A 117(1)(d)). [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
On October 5, 2009, the ED issued a communication pursuant to A 113. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 11:02 am by Oliver G. Randl
Only claims 1 to 15 were searched. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 8:41 am
Contact an Elgin, IL Drug Crimes Attorney If you or someone you know is facing charges of drug trafficking, the lawyers of the Law Office of Brian J. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:38 pm by H. Scott Leviant
” 273 P.3d at 545 (Werdegar, J., concurring).Slip op. at 12.If the California Supreme Court takes up the questions, I will be happy to handle action on the outcome for a 5% vig. [read post]
  Articles 5 and 7 the 1996 Convention deal with jurisdiction and Article 7(1) states: “In the case of wrongful removal or retention of the child, the authorities of the contracting State in which the child was habitually resident immediately before the removal or retention keep their jurisdiction until the child has acquired a habitual residence in another State…” Bearing that provision in mind, and Roderick Wood J’s uncontested decision that… [read post]