Search for: "J. J.A. C."
Results 21 - 40
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm
Côté J.A. and D.C. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:01 am
” Côté J.: “I agree with the majority’s disposition of the appeal, but for different reasons. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
We share Nordheimer J.A. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 12:08 pm
(quoting FRCP 37(c)(1)). [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:57 pm
J.A.4913. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:57 pm
J. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
Blair J.A., dissenting, would have dismissed the appeal. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 11:22 am
While the result is a cumbersome calculation, I see no need to resort to any exceptional construction of the legislation, as discussed by Lamer J., as he then was, in R. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Vernelus, 2022 QCCA 138; 2022 SCC 53 (40072) Kasirer J.: “The Court is of the view that the appeal should be dismissed for the reasons given by Moore J.A. for the majority of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:10 pm
128, Kirkpatrick J.A. [read post]
14 May 2019, 10:48 am
(Chhina, SCC, para.71) In dissent, Abella J. begins with the same sta [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Côté J. reinforced her reputation as the great dissenter. [read post]
17 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
White, 2021 NLCA 39; 2022 SCC 7 (39785) Karakatsanis J.: “This appeal as of right comes to us based on the dissent of Hoegg J.A. in the Court of Appeal of Newfoundland and Labrador. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Binnie J. quoted Improver with approval. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Commonwealth Insurance Company, (1990) 48 B.C.L.R. 2d 305 at pages 309 - 311, and cited by Rowles J.A. in Brown v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 12:57 pm
La señora juez, BELLOTA GUZMÁN J. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:49 am
J. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 10:09 pm
Saul. [70] I consider the following statement of Thackray J.A. in Barreiro v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 2:30 pm
J. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
” Kasirer J.: “I would dismiss the appeal … In sum, in respect of both the mental health and the after-the-fact evidence, I see no reviewable errors in the jury charge and, on these points, I would adopt the majority reasons of van Rensburg J.A. as my own, without reserve. [read post]
