Search for: "J. MARK DAVIS"
Results 21 - 40
of 633
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
” Of course, that unprecedented bicameral congressional determination did not have any formal legal effect because “convict[ion]” under the Impeachment Clause of Article I, Section 3 requires “the Concurrence of two thirds of the [Senate] Members present,” and the Senate fell short of the necessary 67-vote mark. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Davis and Jacob E. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
The 20 statements marked with an asterisk and red font were added in this second tranche. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
J. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm
ICYMI: Mark Graber on Donald Trump and the Jefferson Davis Problem (NYT).Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
Melnick,*Mark Nicas,*David Ozonoff,*Stephen M. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Strine, Jr; Corporate Purpose and Corporate Competition (discussed on the Forum here) by Mark J. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Strine, Jr; Corporate Purpose and Corporate Competition (discussed on the Forum here) by Mark J. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Strine, Jr; Corporate Purpose and Corporate Competition (discussed on the Forum here) by Mark J. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Strine, Jr; Corporate Purpose and Corporate Competition (discussed on the Forum here) by Mark J. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 10:24 am
J. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
National/Federal Rupert Murdoch to Step Down as Chairman of Fox Corporation and Fox News Billings Gazette – David Bauder (Associated Press) | Published: 9/21/2023 Rupert Murdoch, the 92-year-old Australian media magnate whose creation of Fox News made him a force in American politics, is stepping down as leader of both Fox’s parent company and his News Corp. media holdings. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, September 22, 2023 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of September 15-21, 2023 Financial Implications of Rising Political Risk in the US Posted by Stephen Davis (Harvard Law School), on Friday, September 15, 2023 Tags: C+C, CEOs, Presidential elections, US institutions In 2022, Corporate Time Horizons Shorten, Investors’ Lengthen… [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, September 22, 2023 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of September 15-21, 2023 Financial Implications of Rising Political Risk in the US Posted by Stephen Davis (Harvard Law School), on Friday, September 15, 2023 Tags: C+C, CEOs, Presidential elections, US institutions In 2022, Corporate Time Horizons Shorten, Investors’ Lengthen… [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
The complaints relate to: Two editions of Friday Morning with Esther and Phil (presented by husband and wife Conservative MPs Esther McVey and Philip Davies); “State of the Nation”, a programme presented by another Tory MP, Jacob Rees-Mogg; and an episode of the Laurence Fox show which was guest presented by Martin Daubney. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm
Mr B was represented by Liz Davies KC and the landlord by Mark Warwick KC, so this was high powered argument… The original ground of appeal was that the first instance Judge was wrong to find that the tendering of the cheque amounted to return of the deposit where the cheque was not cashed. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
”); Beau J. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Davis (Assistant Professor, The University of Alabama), Brendan Nyhan (James O. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:32 pm
The role of inference in the serious harm test The Court of Appeal essentially overruled Steyn J’s decision on three grounds. [read post]