Search for: "J. Ragland"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
Henderson North Carolina Police Detective J. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 6:00 am
Dante J. [read post]
12 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Jerry J. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 11:14 am
(EDKy) & Gilman, J; Moore, J., concurring in the judgment) (18 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 2:01 pm
Ragland, 481 U. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:00 am
Lockwood and Eric J. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
at 302 (plurality opinion); id. at 306 (Douglas, J., concurring in the judgment). [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 10:11 am
Ragland, the Court held that a tax exemption for magazines "uniformly devoted to religion or sports" was content-based because "[i]n order to determine whether a magazine is subject to sales tax, Arkansas' 'enforcement authorities must necessarily examine the content of the message that is conveyed.'" 481 U.S. 221, 230 (1987) (quoting League of Women Voters, 468 U.S. at 383). [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
The sign involved in this case, which was too large for the audience — if it had been an emblem of a government or religious body, or a “work of art,” it would have been exempted. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
As I’ve mentioned here previously, PFF has been rolling out a new series of essays examining proposals that would have the government play a greater role in sustaining struggling media enterprises, “saving journalism,” or promoting more “public interest” content. [read post]
