Search for: "J.H." Results 81 - 100 of 238
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2017, 10:38 am by Eric Beasley
J.H. eventually sued SCTDD, and SCTDD admitted that it was liable for the accident and J.H. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Thanks to reader J.H. for flagging Alcala v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 2:20 pm by Dan Goodin
" The indictment refers to kernel.org officials P.A. and J.H., who are presumed to be Linux kernel developer H. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 4:49 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Graham, Stuart J.H. and Menell, Peter S. and Shapiro, Carl and Simcoe, Timothy, Final Report of the Berkeley Center for Law & Technology Patent Damages Workshop (August 15, 2016). [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:35 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Rev. 547 (2006) 25 103 Graham, Stuart J.H.; Merges, Robert P.; Samuelson, Pam; Sichelman, Ted High Technology Entrepreneurs and the Patent System: Results of the 2008 Berkeley Patent Survey [article]  24 Berkeley Tech. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:23 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: CIVIL – DEPENDENT NEGLECT DA 15-0368, 2016 MT 35, IN THE MATTER OF: J.H., A Youth in Need of Care. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:46 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Graham, Stuart J.H. and Marco, Alan C. and Myers, Amanda F., Patent Transactions in the Marketplace: Lessons from the USPTO Patent Assignment Dataset (November 1, 2015). [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 8:27 pm by Alfred Brophy
"  Tinsley, who was writing this as a review of J.H. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 1:15 pm by Eric C. Chaffee
The following law review articles relating to securities regulation are now available in paper format: J.H. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:56 am by LaToya Powell
App. 579 (2007) (reversing adjudication for possession with intent to sell or deliver cocaine and remanding for entry of order on simple possession); In re J.H., 177 N.C. [read post]
21 May 2015, 5:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In its place Petitioner is ordered to re-draft an order of protection prohibiting contact between Respondent and her step-sons, M.H. and J.H. only. [read post]