Search for: "JA Designs, LLC"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2020, 9:15 am
Dolgencorp LLC, Ja-Ru, Inc., Toys “R” Us-Delaware, Inc. [read post]
19 May 2020, 9:15 am
Dolgencorp LLC, Ja-Ru, Inc., Toys “R” Us-Delaware, Inc. [read post]
14 May 2020, 8:43 am
Dolgencorp LLC and Ja-Ru (Fed. [read post]
14 May 2020, 11:25 pm
Cir. 1993); see also High Point Design LLC v.Buyer’s Direct, Inc., 621 F. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
JA 394. [read post]
28 May 2020, 11:53 am
Dolgencorp LLC - a case concerning the design of a chalk-holder. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:50 pm
Courts have created two general theories to guide the application of their judicially designed insider trading doctrine, the classical theory and the misappropriation theory. [read post]
12 May 2023, 9:08 am
BioTap, and its clinical laboratory VerraLab JA, LLC, is based in Louisville and performs the drug tests on the urine samples. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 1:07 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITIntellectual PropertyProperty Court Erred in Finding Mark Use Pact Clear, Not Considering Evidence on Parties' Intent JA Apparel Corp., plaintiff-counterclaim-defendant-appellee v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:12 pm
” JA 319. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 8:39 am
Ja es, 2023 Ga. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:36 pm
Ennis, JA 100028, ¶ 18. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
