Search for: "JAMES BATSON" Results 41 - 60 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2007, 1:49 pm
Illinois, which says a juror must be removed for cause if his religious views prevent him from applying the law, and Batson v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 11:09 pm by Fernando M. Pinguelo
I even spotted a couple of eDiscovelebrities walking the halls and browsing the exhibits, notably: Laura Zubulake (the princess of eDiscovery), James Batson (Zubulake’s Counsel), and Alex Arato (Associate General Counsel, CA, Inc.). [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am by Amy Howe
Texas, in which the Court will consider whether the state used the correct standard to determine whether death-row inmate Bobby James Moore is too intellectually disabled to be executed, as well as the grant in Buck v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:15 am
State: The court of appeals had reversed for the denial of a Batson challenge. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 1:49 pm
Illinois, which says a juror must be removed for cause if his religious views prevent him from applying the law, and Batson v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:28 pm by Kalvis Golde
Texas 23-248Issue: Whether the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision that James Broadnax failed to establish a prima facie equal protection claim conflicts with this court’s decision in Batson v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:45 pm by Mark Walsh
The public section is relatively full, and we understand that James Obergefell, the lead petitioner in the same-sex marriage cases, was first in line for a seat in that section again today. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
James Gallaher, Jr., 2010 U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-8278, a habeas case from the Third Circuit involving claims of error under Brady, Batson, and Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(6) (codifying the forfeiture-by-wrongdoing exception to the hearsay rules). [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am by John Elwood
” The question presented is whether that provision limits the benefits available to petitioner James Rudisill – essentially limiting him to a maximum of 36 months of benefits — or whether that limitation does not apply to veterans like him who have at least two distinct periods of qualifying service. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-6140, James v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am by John Elwood
First, he claims the trial court did not adequately investigate racial discrimination under Batson v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am by cdw
James Lynn Styers, 2011 Ariz. [read post]