Search for: "JANICE ROGERS BROWN"
Results 81 - 100
of 308
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2015, 11:42 am
" Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown wrote today's opinion on behalf of a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:53 am
Given Judge Sentelle’s comments at oral argument, this approach certainly won’t have his vote, and notwithstanding my comment on Saturday, I doubt it will attract either of the other two panelists either: Stephen Williams or Janice Rogers Brown. [read post]
7 May 2015, 7:56 am
Questioned by Judge Janice Rogers Brown on why it took Copley so long to file for an exemption, Honigberg stated that the company tried numerous times in the six years following the SEC’s original notice to get the agency’s attention, but was “stonewalled at every turn. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:05 pm
Circuit, Janice Rogers Brown’s concurrence in Gross v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:00 pm
Moreover, the opinion by Judge Janice Rogers Brown held that the regulatory structure created by Congress “is as close to the blatantly unconstitutional scheme in Carter Coal as we have seen. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 2:55 pm
Oral argument took place last Tuesday before Judge Janice Rogers Brown and Senior Judges Stephen Williams and David Sentelle (audio here). [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
The panel’s presiding judge, Judge Janice Rogers Brown, observes that the current third party rule furnishes a nice “bright line” for courts and police to apply. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 9:55 am
Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown delivered this Heritage Foundation lecture, which you can view online via YouTube. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:33 am
As Judge Janice Rogers Brown noted in her concurring opinion in the en banc decision, James Madison suggested in Federalist No. 42 that Congress was entitled to deference in defining and providing for the punishment of violations of the law of nations. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 5:58 am
The 21-page filing opens by stating that the decision rendered by the three-judge panel (Judges Janice Rogers Brown, David Tatel and Senior Judge A. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:19 am
Written by Judge Janice Rogers Brown, the opinion in Stop This Insanity, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 5:07 am
” Briefly: At The Legal Pulse, Glenn Lammi highlights a recent dissent by Judge Janice Rogers Brown of the U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:05 pm
Circuit panel, Janice Rogers Brown writing, strikes down DC tour guide licensing scheme [Ilya Shapiro/Cato, WaPo, Orin Kerr] “Why Progressives Shouldn’t Support Public Workers Unions” [Dmitri Mehlhorn/Daily Beast] “James Sherk of Heritage on Members-Only Bargaining” [On Labor] As discrimination law gradually swallows all else: “Rep. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 6:55 am
” Later, Peter Margulies considered the concurring opinion written by Judge Janice Rogers Brown and concluded that “judicial deference” to Congress’s power to codify and interpret international law is best. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 3:00 pm
Circuit, composed of Circuit Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson (who authored the opinion), and Circuit Judges Janice Rogers Brown and Robert L. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm
While Marty and Steve don’t directly address the question of Congress’s power to convene military commissions under Article I, the best answer is that courts should provide Congress with a measure of deference, as Judge Janice Rogers Brown explained in her concurrence (see my post). [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
When a three-judge panel once more takes up the Guantanamo detainee’s appeal, Judge Janice Rogers Brown’s subtle and incisive concurring opinion—which discusses that very issue at length—should be on the front burner. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 10:08 am
Separate concurring or partial dissenting opinions were written by Circuit Judges Janice Rogers Brown, Brett M. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:50 am
From the opinion by Judge Janice Rogers Brown joined by Judges Henderson and Wilkins: In Washington, D.C., it is illegal to talk about points of interest or the history of the city while escorting or guiding a person who paid you to do so—that is, unless you pay the government $200 and pass a 100-question multiple-choice exam. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am
Paul Clement rises for the Ralls Corporation to address Judges Karen LeCraft Henderson, Janice Rogers Brown and Roger Wilkins and begins by challenging two premises of the lower court’s conclusions: first, its substantive dismissal of Ralls’s due process claims against the president, and second, its determination that the president’s order mooted Ralls’ claims against CFIUS. [read post]
