Search for: "JOEL TENENBAUM"
Results 121 - 140
of 317
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2010, 10:12 am
It's still unclear how much of the jury's award of $675,000 in statutory damages Joel Tenenbaum will have to pay for his admitted copyright infringement. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 12:26 pm
Earlier this year, Joel Tenenbaum was held liable for $675,000 for file sharing 30 songs – that’s $22,500 per song. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:35 am
The second case concerns Joel Tenenbaum, a Boston University grad student who a jury ordered to pay $675,000 for file sharing 30 tracks last year. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:18 am
Joel Tenenbaum filed a final brief on Feb. 18, 2010 in Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 8:53 am
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Smaller Damages Sought in Music Case First off today Joel Tenenbaum, who was found liable for $675,000 in damages for sharing music files online, was the subject of a hearing where his attorney, Charles Nesson, asked a sympathetic judge to reduce the damages. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:00 am
The decision resolved a long-simmering debate among the federal circuits, which, for the past 51 years, have used a hodgepodge of tests to answer the jurisdictional question" At hearing, Boston music downloader argues for new trial or reduced verdict "Lawyers at a District of Massachusetts hearing about whether music downloader Joel Tenenbaum should have a new copyright infringement trial or whether the court should reduce the $675,000 jury verdict, debated… [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 4:08 pm
This afternoon Judge Nancy Gertner held oral argument on Joel Tenenbaum's motion to reduce the jury's award of $675,000 for downloading and distributing 30 songs over the KaZaA peer-to-peer network. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 9:29 pm
The brief states that the plaintiffs' opposition to Tenenbaum's motion contains the "assertion that Joel Tenenbaum caused them 'billions of dollars' of damages in lost revenue, Pl. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 8:37 pm
The move, just days before a scheduled February 23 hearing on the motion, came after Nesson, counsel to peer-to-peer poster-boy Joel Tenenbaum, reversed course and "confirmed that he has destroyed all copies of these recordings, including any copies that may have been held by his student lawyers, client, and other colleagues, and that he has removed links to these copies from the Internet. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 9:03 am
Peter Menell of Berkeley Law School has a short but excellent article up on the web site of The Media Institute, making a point that it's bit ridiculous even needs to be made: Joel Tenenbaum is no Rosa Parks! [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 8:34 pm
Nor has Tenenbaum cited to one. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 8:21 pm
So far, Naomi has posts on the Copyright Office's new deposit exemption for online works, the decision in the IsoHunt case, and Judge Gertner's order rejecting fair use in the Joel Tenenbaum case. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 11:47 am
Lawyers in that Joel Tenenbaum case are asking for a new trial or for the judge to reduce damages to the minimum $750 a track. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 1:52 pm
(Note that all three juries to have sat in individual peer-to-peer cases have awarded much higher than that: $9,250 (Thomas-Rasset #1); $80,000 (Thomas-Rasset #2); and $22,500 (Joel Tenenbaum).) [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 9:13 am
Since juries last summer returned the huge verdicts against Jammie Thomas-Rasset and Joel Tenenbaum for their use of peer-to-peer networks to download and "share" music, attention has been focused on the question whether the massive awards ($1.92 million and $675,000, respectively) were unconstitutionally excessive. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 12:10 pm
One case in Boston still on the books concerns Joel Tenenbaum, the nation's only other individual to go to trial against the RIAA. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 9:35 am
And it enjoined Thomas-Rasset from further infringement (both downloading and distributing), and ordered her to destroy all copies of the plaintiffs songs that she obtained without permission.A similar motion to reduce the jury's verdict of $22,500 per song is pending in the Joel Tenenbaum case. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 10:22 am
" The administration's court filing Tuesday is the latest in the case of Joel Tenenbaum, a Boston University graduate student who was the nation's second defendant to go to trial against the RIAA on file sharing charges. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 8:02 am
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Department of Justice defends constitutionality of $675,000 award against Tenenbaum First off today, the Justice Department filed a brief in the Joel Tenenbaum case defending the jury's $675,000 judgment against him for his admitted file sharing. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 4:24 pm
The Department of Justice today defended against constitutional challenge the $675,000 statutory damages award a Boston jury imposed on admitted copyright infringer Joel Tenenbaum, arguing that his use of peer-to-peer networks to obtain free music and distribute it to untold numbers of others caused "great public harm. [read post]
