Search for: "JOHN AND JANE DOES 1 TO 20" Results 81 - 100 of 144
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2014, 3:56 pm by Howard Knopf
John Doe and Jane Doe matter presided over by Mme Prothonotary Aronovitch concerning Teksavvy’s motion to be reimbursed by Voltage for its “reasonable costs in the event it had to release information” arising from Prothonotary Aalto’s order of February 20, 2014 which ordered that that:3. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:13 am by Joy Waltemath
Subsequently, the employer filed suit in state court against two building residents, Internet service providers, 20 anonymous John and Jane Does, and three former employees. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:16 am
  Table of Contents   Section 1: Use of Fictitious Names or Pseudonyms in Connecticut Courts Table 1: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Civil Matters Table 2: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Summary Process Matters Section 2: Use of Fictitious Business Names in Connecticut Table 3: Use of Fictitious Business Names Section 3: Criminal Impersonation in Connecticut Published: 6/6/2013 9:20 AM [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:37 pm
A typical exception for oil and gas lease might read: “Oil and Gas Lease from John Doe and Jane Doe to ABC Oil Co., dated May 16, 2012 and filed May 18, 2012 as Reception No. 152637 of Summit County Records. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:13 pm by scanner1
FERN HART, individually; MICHAEL KENNEDY, individually, and JANE and JOHN DOES 1-20, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants, Appellees, Cross-Appellants. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
These excerpts are part of a larger article, “Closing Pandora’s Box: Speculative Invoicing and Opportunism in File Sharing” from the Fall Issue, Volume 12-1, of the Wake Forest Journal of Business & Intellectual Property Law. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:42 am by D. Daxton White
When it comes to understanding the potential risks, costs, and advantages of the various investment “products” offered today, a prudent investor must begin by understanding the role of the person from whom they are purchasing the investment. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 6:45 am by Kenan Farrell
John Does 1-7 (15 Movies) Jane Magnus-Stinson, Debra McVicker-Lynch CP Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 6:30 am by Kenan Farrell
John Doe Court Case Number:    1:12-cv-00838-JMS-DML File Date:    Monday, June 18, 2012 Plaintiff:     Millennium TGA Inc. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:10 am by Steve Hall
Jane Hull disagreed with the board and allowed the execution to proceed. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by INFORRM
Mapping Russian Twitter, by John Kelly, Vladimir Barash, Karina Alexanyan, Bruce Etling, Robert Faris, Urs Gasser, and John Palfrey. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:46 am by Kenan Farrell
McKenna of Woodhard, Emhardt, Moriarity, McNett & Henry, LLP Defendant:     Shannon Bartnick, Chris Bartnick, John and Jane Does 1-15 Cause:    Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Trademark Deceptive Consumer Sales Activities under Ind. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 7:02 pm by Mandelman
”   “The Free for Life” In this reality-based comedy, John and Jane Q. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 6:55 am by Derek Bambauer
The right to be forgotten is now found in Article 17, the right to object to processing is contained in Articles 19 and 20, and the Article 79 fines have been lowered from 3% to 1% of annual global revenues. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Jane Fae, a specialist in the Obscene Publications Act, comments on the case here. [read post]