Search for: "JOHN DOE CORP. (1-10)" Results 41 - 60 of 761
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2020, 4:11 am
"Accordingly, Opposer has established the necessary relationship to New Cingular such that it 'can reasonably believe that damage to the subsidiary will naturally lead to financial injury to itself,'" and opposer thus proven that it has standing to pursue its false connection claim under Section 2(a).The Board then set a schedule for discovery and trial of the substantive issues in the case.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Now AT&T has to prove its… [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 4:30 am by Sean Wajert
John Deere Co., 494 U.S. 516, 523 (1990) ( § 1404(a) transfer does not change the law applicable in a diversity case); Eggleton v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 2:04 pm by Alexander Berengaut and Tarek Austin
Does 1-59, for example, hackers unlawfully accessed copyrighted materials on a company’s protected website.[5] The company brought suit against the unknown culprits — named “John Does” in the complaint — for violating the CFAA, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and the Copyright Act.[6] It then provided the court with the internet protocol addresses of each defendant.[7] The court granted the company’s motion that it be… [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:53 am by Gritsforbreakfast
And they're not the only one:The jail bond deal is the latest of dozens under audit where the IRS has suggested that significant amounts of federal inmates paid for by the federal government and management contracts with private parties make the bonds taxable private-activity bonds.Tax-exempt bonds are private-activity bonds if more than 10% of the proceeds are for private use and more than 10% of the payments for debt service are from private parties. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:45 am by Sheldon Toplitt
John Does 1-25 (Case No. 2:10-cv-1275-DAK) cited First Amendment safeguards for unidentified environmental advocates who used the Internet to perpetrate a media hoax on plaintiff Koch Industries, Inc., as the basis for dismissing the company's lawsuit against the anonymous jokesters.In an 18-page memorandum of decision and order, U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 1:43 am
The Act is designed to keep pollution out of "navigable waters," but what does that term mean? [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 1:00 pm by Sarah Grant
District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly’s order last month in Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am by John Elwood
Cobb 13-138Issue: (1) Whether after Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 12:46 pm
XYZ Company Nos. 1-25 et al Texas Western District Court Filed: March 10, 2008 Plaintiff: NetSpend Corporation Defendant: XYZ Company Nos. 1-25, John/Jane Does 1-25 Case Number: 1:2008cv00196 Monterey Gourmet Foods, Inc. v. [read post]