Search for: "JOHN DOES 1-V" Results 21 - 40 of 6,812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2012, 4:29 pm by Ray Beckerman
John Does 1-45, Doe #41 has filed a motion to sever John Does 2-45, dismiss the complaint as to them, and quash the related subpoenas.Notice of MotionMemorandum of LawDoe #41 DeclarationMorlan Ty Rogers Affidavit var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 1:08 pm by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-5, a BitTorrent download case pending in Manhattan before Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, John Doe #4 filed his reply memo today, further supporting his motion to quash the subpoena, and to sever and dismiss the claim against him. [read post]
31 May 2012, 1:53 pm by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-37, has severed as to all defendants except John Doe #1, and granted discovery as to John Doe #1.Report and recommendation severing as to John Does 2-11Order granting discovery as to John Doe #1 only[Ed. note. [read post]
2 May 2008, 11:56 am
Does 1-10, John Doe #4 has made a motion to dismiss the Linares declaration, dismiss the complaint, and quash the subpoena. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 9:03 am by Ron Coleman
John Doe 1, in which Doe does not appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 3:41 pm by Kenan Farrell
John Doe Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00071-RLM-RBCFile Date: Thursday, March 14, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 11:33 am
Does 1-11, the case which targets Oklahoma State University students, "John Does" have made a motion to strike the RIAA's papers, and dismiss the complaint, based upon the RIAA's "contemptuous behavior" in disregard of the Court's rules and a Court order. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 1:41 pm
Does 1-14 (Phoenix, AZ) was turned over one day after John Doe #3 had filed a motion to quash the subpoena, and on the same day that John Doe #8 joined in John Doe #3's motion.We have no idea how this happened, but it would seem that (a) the University of Arizona should not have responded to the subpoena when a motion to quash the subpoena had been filed, and (b) the motions to quash aren't going to be of much use to… [read post]