Search for: "JONES v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al" Results 1 - 20 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2017, 10:03 am by MBettman
”                                            Justice French On February 7, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Ohio Patrolmen’s Benevolent Ass’n, et al. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 7:39 am by MBettman
On February 7, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Ohio Patrolmen’s Benevolent Ass’n, et al. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument at 10 a.m. next Monday in Free Enterprise Fund, et al., v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:06 am
Zeneca (07-822) and the Paxil and Zoloft case was Colacicco, et al., v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Defense Department et al. v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
LASALLE, P.J, CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur. 2019-08292 DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION N.B.In the Matter of Myrna Bailenson, et al., respondents, v Board of Education of the Chappaqua Central School District, et al., appellants. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
LASALLE, P.J, CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur. 2019-08292 DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION N.B.In the Matter of Myrna Bailenson, et al., respondents, v Board of Education of the Chappaqua Central School District, et al., appellants. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
LASALLE, P.J, CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur. 2019-08292 DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION N.B.In the Matter of Myrna Bailenson, et al., respondents, v Board of Education of the Chappaqua Central School District, et al., appellants. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
LASALLE, P.J, CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur. 2019-08292 DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION N.B.In the Matter of Myrna Bailenson, et al., respondents, v Board of Education of the Chappaqua Central School District, et al., appellants. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am by Amanda Rice
Massey Coal Company, Inc., et al., the Court’s 2009 judicial recusal case. [read post]
Pham and the Open Society Justice Initiative argued that if the Supreme Court was in any doubt on the application of EU law, it should refer the ambiguity to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). [read post]