Search for: "Jack M. Balkin" Results 1 - 20 of 533
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Professor Jack Balkin's new book, "Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation," continues the author's longstanding efforts to merge living constitutionalism and originalism into a workable and normatively attractive theory of constitutional interpretation. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Foran, Discrimination and Manifestation of Belief: Higgs v Farmor's School [2023] EAT 89, (Industrial Law Journal, Forthcoming).Jack M. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:33 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Feder and Lee, Katherine and Grimmelmann, James and Grimmelmann, James and Daphne Ippolito, Daphne Ippolito and Callison-Burch, Christopher and Choquette-Choo, Christopher A. and Mireshghallah, Niloofar and Brundage, Miles and Mimno, David and Choksi, Madiha Zahrah and Balkin, Jack M. and Carlini, Nicholas and De Sa, Christopher and Frankle, Jonathan and Ganguli, Deep and Gipson, Bryant and Guadamuz, Andres and Harris, Swee Leng and Jacobs, Abigail and Joh, Elizabeth E.… [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:27 am by Rick Hasen
I’m very grateful to Jack Balkin for hosting a symposium over the next week or so on my new book, A Real Right to Vote. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm by Daphne Keller
For more on my own positions: here is my take on must-carry issues generally, and here is the amicus brief I filed in NetChoice with Jack Balkin and the Yale MFIA clinic on behalf of Francis Fukuyama; here is my Senate testimony about platform transparency generally, and here is a detailed constitutional analysis of the Texas and Florida transparency rules. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Our starting points will be Jack Balkin’s Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation (2024) and Jonathan Gienapp’s Against Constitutional Originalism: A Historical Critique (2024). [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
And I accept Jack Balkin’s point that federal systems require more judicial review than unitary systems. [read post]