Search for: "Jackson v. Social Security Administration" Results 41 - 60 of 137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
It’s difficult to tell how much of an impact Robert’s efforts had in helping John secure the nomination, but I think we can assume they helped to assuage the main concern about him – ironically, that he was insufficiently supportive of civil rights. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Events The Bonavero Institute, University of Oxford, is hosting an online lecture by Vicki C Jackson titled Knowledge Institutions in Constitutional Democracies: Reflections on “the Press” on 22 March 2022, 15:00-16:30. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
    That’s why the NATO Alliance was created to secure peace and stability in Europe after World War 2. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 9:03 pm by Henry Miller
Jackson Women’s Health, a case that challenges the Court’s holding in Roe v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court gets ready to hear New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 11:35 am by Forrest G. Read IV
District Court Judge Andrew Hanen in State of Texas et al. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:15 pm by Josh Blackman
FDR feared future rulings would overturn other reforms, including Social Security. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 10:16 am by Josh Blackman
Consistent with this important practice, the Department is defending the constitutionality of the Social Security Act provision in this case. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 4:01 am by Administrator
In R v Suter, the Supreme Court of Canada explained collateral consequences in the context of sentencing as follows: a collateral consequence includes any consequence arising from the commission of an offence, the conviction for an offence, or the sen­tence imposed for an offence, that impacts the offender. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Top British clubs have been urged to stop linking to betting websites from their social media channels because of the potential harm it could cause. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
Barrett dissented, concluding that the Department of Homeland Security’s interpretation was reasonable. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 10:27 am by Amy L. Peck and Michael H. Neifach
Such prospective harms could include: $132 billion loss in GDP and $5.2 billion loss in Social Security and Medicare contributions – this was before the current economic crisis brought on by COVID-19. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 4:48 am by Sophia Tang
The discretion shield aims to “prevent judicial ‘second-guessing’ of legislative and administrative decisions grounded in social, economic, and political policy through the medium of an action in tort. [read post]