Search for: "James C. Justice, II"
Results 1 - 20
of 381
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
See James v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Speaking through Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the Justices elaborated upon their less constricted version of the “authority or duty” test in a way that provides some guidance to government officials. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
II. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 11:45 am
II, § 2, cl. 1. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
One need look no further than last week’s sentencing of Samuel Bankman-Fried to see the impact of noncompliance.[12] In advance of the sentencing, the Department of Justice filed hundreds of victim statements with the court.[13] The victim statements reflect the incredibly broad cross-section of people who were harmed by the fraud that Bankman-Fried was convicted of: single parents, retirees, young people, grandparents. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
See James v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 7:26 am
That real live plot, recently noted in a Department of Justice press release, sounds like the hobby or side hustle for the villain in a James Bond movie. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
When Taft assumed the chief justiceship the previous year, the Court was a relatively moderate right-of-center body, as only Justices James C. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
See James v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 11:12 pm
On May 29, 1787, James Madison introduced the Virginia Plan. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
If A conspires with B who conspires with C, all are linked in one conspiracy—even if A does not even know that C exists (and vice versa) and even if their specific plans diverge in many details.[23] (This is why the Amar brief repeatedly speaks of, for example, "Floyd and other top officials" and "Floyd and his allies. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
And we know from Article II, Section 1 that "appoint" and "choose" are used as synonyms. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:06 am
”[ii] The district court’s ruling was appealed to the Sixth Circuit, where it is now fully briefed and awaiting a decision. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
II. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
(We discuss the Amars' position at some length in Part II of our 10-part series.) [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
The Colorado Supreme Court engaged in improper speculation about Chief Justice Chase's motives D. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Session 3: Federalism John C. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:21 am
” (C.G. 1711, [ii]). [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
That conception included a republican reading of legal history (based on a controversial but exciting reading of the works of James Madison and Thomas Jefferson), and a deliberative conception of democracy (like the one advanced by Jurgen Habermas or Jon Elster). [read post]
