Search for: "James H. Smith" Results 41 - 60 of 409
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
American by Birthbegins its examination of birthright citizenship with Calvin’s Case in 1608, as do two older works on citizenship that it does not cite, but with which its case discussions are largely consistent: historian James H. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:20 pm by Emily Dai
In session III, Cameron Kerry, Brookings Ann R. and Andrew H. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 7:11 am by Jennifer Brand
McCree Collegiate Professor of Law, Michigan Law Anita Carr Shapiro (In Memoriam), President Emerita, Practising Law Institute Nikki Shaver, Managing Director of Innovation and Knowledge, Paul Hastings Evan Shenkman, Chief Knowledge and Innovation Officer, Fisher Phillips Daryl Shetterly, Director of Orrick Analytics, Orrick, Herring & Sutcliffe LLP Barry Simpson, Executive Director, Pennsylvania Bar Association Alex Smith, Global Product Management Lead, iManage RAVN Brad Stern, County… [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 7:00 am by Jean O'Grady
I am always please to see long term knowledge and library colleagues including June Liebert, Holly Riccio, Katherine Lowery, James Duggan and Nikki Shaver included in the roster. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 5:45 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
§1930(f); (H) the debtor has not filed with the court a statement of completion of a course concerning personal financial management if required by Rule 1007(b)(7); (I) a motion to delay or postpone discharge under §727(a)(12) is pending; (J) a motion to enlarge the time to file a reaffirmation agreement under Rule 4008(a) is pending; (K) a presumption is in effect under §524(m) that a reaffirmation agreement is an undue hardship, and the court has not concluded a hearing on… [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 12:59 pm by admin
The plaintiffs’ counsel, Cranor and Smith, and CERT failed to disclose that CERT was founded by the two witnesses, Cranor and Smith, whose exclusion was at issue.[3] Many of the lawsuit industry’s regular testifiers were signatories, and none raised any ethical qualms about the obvious conflict of interest, or the conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.[4] Cranor equates WOE to “inference to the best explanation,” which reductively strips science of its… [read post]