Search for: "James W."
Results 61 - 80
of 4,558
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2024, 7:28 am
James Markham. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
See James v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Gracias, Steve Jurvetson, James Murdoch, and Linda Johnson Rice. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Gracias, Steve Jurvetson, James Murdoch, and Linda Johnson Rice. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:00 pm
Werner, Sisyphus in robes: International law, legal interpretation and the absurd Nina Reiners, States as bystanders of legal change: Alternative paths for the human rights to water and sanitation in international law Eliana Cusato & Emily Jones, The ‘imbroglio’ of ecocide: A political economic analysis International Law and Practice Louis Bélanger & Jean-Frédéric Morin, Treaty amendment procedures: A typology from a survey of multilateral… [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
The former president had not forgotten how Brandeis had humiliated him and his attorney general, George W. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 11:11 am
” (p. 9-10) Note: We note that this articulation is so reminiscent of James Comey’s embroidering of the facts: the bottom line is in the second sentence; the first sentence is irrelevant and serves no prosecutorial purpose, which leaves one to rightly wonder why it is included. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm
… [W]e also agree that FAIR has standing. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:55 am
By Yousuf Syed Khan (@yousufsyedkhan) (October 17, 2023) Expert Guidance: Law of Armed Conflict in the Israel-Hamas WarBy Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw), Michael W. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:47 am
“[W]ords are . . . the material of which laws are made. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:47 am
“[W]ords are . . . the material of which laws are made. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
[A reply to Prof. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:07 am
My coauthor, SMU Law Professor James W. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:35 am
James’ article The African-American Church, Political Activity, and Tax Exemption is cited in the following book: W. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:59 am
Gerry W. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:00 am
David W. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
Part II of Donald Trump’s brief argues that the factual predicate for the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove Trump’s name from the primary ballot was absent because Trump did not “engage in” an insurrection against the United States on January 6, 2021.[1] [Apologies in advance about all the footnotes, but I didn't want to clutter the text with too many peripheral matters.]The Colorado Supreme Court held that Trump’s words on January 6… [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 12:01 am
W. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 11:12 am
James W. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
GRACIAS, JAMES MURDOCH, LINDA JOHNSON RICE, BRAD W. [read post]
