Search for: "James v. Curry"
Results 41 - 60
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2017, 11:08 am
Curry. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 11:08 am
Curry. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 8:07 pm
And more good news: his first in the series, Solomon v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
v=NsJHqstPuNo UPDATE: Governor Branstad signed the bill into law. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Cox Brainerd Currie Professor of Law Duke University School of Law Lawrence A. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
Cicero Assistant Professor of Finance Lerner College of Business and Economics University of Delaware Jim Cox Brainerd Currie Professor of Law Duke Law School Martijn Cremers Associate Professor of Finance Yale School of Management Lawrence A. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:23 am
Trinity Lutheran of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 10:58 am
As James W. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 7:48 am
The Supreme Court in its famous 1969 Brandenburg v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 7:13 am
(See McCollum v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm
Curry, 79, of Fort Worth, died January 21, 2021. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm
The President is having a bad week. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:27 am
He and James Fishkin imagine a “Deliberation Day” on which people meet to debate and reach decisions on crucial issues of the day. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am
Every custody block has its own special blend of a very familiar smell; unwashed people, smelly shoes, microwave curries and the cheap air freshener they use to hide all the smells. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 1:00 am
V. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Plymouth, MA; James Baker, President) 21 Street, Inc. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am
Republican politicians have embraced immigration as a potent political issue. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
