Search for: "James v. Internal Revenue Service et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2011, 8:00 am
Sisneros et al. was conducted by the Internal Revenue Service - Criminal Investigations. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:56 am
Exterior of the Internal Revenue Service office in midtown New York. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
Pix Credit hereESG, has been driven by the private sector and intensely debated in the context of privately ordered responsible business conduct standards, and formed part of a rich debates among market actors and public international organizations about the role and nature of so-called non-financial siclosure in genmeral, and sustainability and climate related factors in decision making. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 7:20 am
Internal Revenue Service et al, was dismissed by U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
I took the liberty of saying “yes” as in, for example, James F. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
Adam Chodorow et al., Common Sense Recommendations for the Application of Tax Law to Digital Assets (October 16, 2023) (Wayne State University Law School Research Paper No. 2023-22) In response to the Joint Committee on Taxation’s July 2023 request for comments on application of various Internal Revenue Code sections on digital assets, we propose a consistent set of rules to apply current law to digital assets. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Title: Placer Dome, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
L. 357-398 (2010).Vandenbergh, Michael P., et al. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
District Judge James M. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
He argues that declining revenues in traditional television packages are not “lost revenues” due to illegal streaming but rather that “the money is actually going” to paid Internet streaming services such as Netflix. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm
Viacom Intl., et. al. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
”[28] V. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:44 am
” Philip Wexler, Bethesda, et al., eds., 2 Encyclopedia of Toxicology 96 (2005). [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
In February the Higher Regional Court Munich (OLG) decided that YouTube and its service cannot be called to account for any user generated copyright infringements. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:39 pm
Spece Jr. et al., (Implicit) Consent to Intimacy, 50 IND. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am
Karen Bass et al. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 6:25 am
" http://j.st/p24 Libertarian Party of ND, et al. v. [read post]
