Search for: "Jammie Thomas-Rasset"
Results 81 - 100
of 247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2010, 2:50 am
" http://j.mp/a8oCb8 chuckling at "Brisbane News Shenanigans" ... or as @thedanbarrett says, "the twitter equivalent of 'the human centipede'" http://j.mp/bIk7CZ jammie thomas-rasset just doesn't give up ... [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 6:24 pm
” Jammie Thomas-Rasset has been battling the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) for the last four years in one of the RIAA’s “top 3? [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 2:32 am
which has included settlement offers and two previous jury decisions, a third jury decided that Jammie Thomas-Rasset owed the RIAA $62,500...per song. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 11:37 am
Jammie Thomas-Rasset for the third time was found liable for downloading music. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 10:39 am
Jammie Thomas-Rasset has been dealt another setback in her long-running court battle over sharing 24 songs illegally online. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:54 am
Thomas-Rasset. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 6:49 am
It's been a long, winding, miserable road for Jammie Thomas-Rasset. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:31 pm
Nesson admitted pro hac vice: Capitol v Thomas-Rasset (Recording Industry vs. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:24 pm
Separately, see Minnesota Mom Hit With $1.5 Million Fine for Downloading 24 Songs on Jammie Thomas-Rasset downloading 24 songs from Kazaa. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:51 pm
Segundo o jornal “Star Tribune”, um júri de Minnesota pediu a Jammie Thomas-Rasset para pagar US$ 62,5 mil por música. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 10:28 am
Accused file-swapper Jammie Thomas-Rasset was yesterday hit with a $1.5 million fine for downloading and distributing tunes by Richard Marx, Journey, Def Leppard, the Goo Goo Dolls, No Doubt, and others. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:51 am
Thomas-Rasset, which concluded yesterday, after the Judge refused to instruct the jurors that the amount of the award was required to bear a reasonable relationship to the actual damages sustained by plaintiffs, the jury returned a verdict of $62,500 per song, for a total of $1.5 million.The Judge has previously ruled that the maximum allowable amount in the case is $54,000.Court minutesVerdict[Ed. note. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:02 am
Nothing better illustrates the profound inequity of capping noneconomic damages than the verdicts against file sharers: Jammie Thomas-Rasset, the Minnesota woman who has been fighting the recording industry over 24 songs she illegally downloaded and shared online four years ago, has lost another round in court. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 6:49 am
Here are the 24 tracks at issue in the Thomas-Rasset case. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 9:16 pm
The Minneapolis jury determined Jammie Thomas-Rasset was responsible for $1.5 million in damages for distributing 24 songs on the KaZaA peer-to-peer file sharing network. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:19 pm
UPDATE: A third jury finds damages of $1.5 million this time against Jammie Thomas-Rasset (who had turned down a offer to settle for $25,000). [11/1/2010 post:] U.S. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:45 pm
Jammie Thomas-Rasset must pay $62,500 for each of the 24 songs at issue in the case, for total of $1.5 million. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:10 pm
Testimony in the Jammie Thomas-Rasset file-sharing re-retrial concluded today as Thomas-Rasset took the stand and told the jury that she considers herself a big supporter of the music industry (read our coverage of day one). [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:24 pm
Thomas-Rasset is expected to challenge the size of the award again, and the judge has already determined that $54,000 is the maximum acceptable size for an award given the evidence in the case.I'll update as more information becomes available.Jammie Thomas-Rasset Verdict [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:21 pm
Davis, Chief Judge for the District of Minnesota, opened the remarkable third trial of peer-to-peer file-swapper Jammie Thomas-Rasset today with a quip. [read post]
