Search for: "Jane Does #1-2"
Results 61 - 80
of 981
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2013, 2:04 pm
It is also known as theBechdel/Wallace test,[1] the Bechdel rule,[2] Bechdel's law,[3] or the Mo Movie Measure.[4] Well he's right, and it's new to me, but I want to plug it into a larger matrix about women-talking-about-men-talking-about women and suchlike. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Yarbrough (D.N.M.): … Plaintiff filed her complaint under the pseudonym "Jane Doe. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 4:05 am
Their religious objections are set out at length in the complaint (full text) in Jane Doe 1 v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
(a)(2); counts 1 and 2), and one count of failing to register as a sex offender (former § 290, subd. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:28 am
On the evening of December 14, 2014, Plaintiff John Doe, Jane Roe, and several of Doe’s friends, identified as “K.P” and “A.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:05 am
According to the Complaint, Defendant, Jane Doe aka Denise Gilbey Moe (“Defendant” or “Moe”), was employed by VAF until October 2018. [read post]
27 May 2013, 6:20 am
Free speech rights aside, professional women . . . do not need the [Jane Does] of the planet eroding their hard earned respect in the marketplace. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 10:19 am
The inquiry is setting-specific: that a statement may be capable of objective verification in some contexts does not make it an objectively verifiable fact in every context. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 11:31 am
The women are only identified in court files as Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:33 am
Calvin Univ.: In 2020, Plaintiff Jane Doe attended Calvin University in Grand Rapids, Michigan. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:28 pm
The suit has also named several Jane Does as defendants, a legal tactic commonly used as a placeholder when the identities of defendants are unknown. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am
Later that day, by a 2-1 vote, it stayed those portions of the injunction that prohibited HHS from preventing others from transporting Doe to a facility for the abortion and “from interfering with or obstructing J.D. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 1:21 pm
In Stewart for Jane Doe v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 6:17 am
FCC vote 3-2 to uphold net neutrality. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Allusion From First Circuit Decision - Belling the Cat - Mice Agreeing To Do Something ImpossibleIn Jane Doe No. 1 v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Allusion From First Circuit Decision - Belling the Cat - Mice Agreeing To Do Something ImpossibleIn Jane Doe No. 1 v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Allusion From First Circuit Decision - Belling the Cat - Mice Agreeing To Do Something ImpossibleIn Jane Doe No. 1 v. [read post]
21 Aug 2021, 5:40 am
Fictitious Names In An Illinois Divorce Illinois law allows any litigant to request to use a pseudonym like John Doe or Jane Doe. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 8:46 pm
Doe 1, S171382. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:38 am
Under the legal standard, "the permissibility of fees charged for the use of state facilities is evaluated under three prongs, which ask whether the fee (1) is based on some fair approximation of use of the facilities, (2) is not excessive in relation to the benefits conferred, and (3) does not discriminate against interstate commerce. [read post]
