Search for: "Jane Does 1-3" Results 161 - 180 of 808
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2022, 12:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
In the interests of space, I'll skip items 1 and 2 (though you can read them in the opinion), and focus on item 3: The above allegations taken together sufficiently allege background indicia of sex discrimination. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:45 pm
" Witness Jane testified joined in sexual massages with her and Epstein. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 9:22 am by Samantha Rocco
Now, let’s say Jane does not sell her ABC Corporation shares, and instead, Jane transfers the 100 shares, which have a fair market value of $150, to XYZ Charity. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:39 am
| Special interview with Mariana Karepova, the President of the Austrian Patent Office | ChIPs Global Summit Report 1: Politics and Technology - When D.C. met Silicon Valley | Book review: Kritika - Essays on Intellectual Property (vol 3) | Tuesday TiddlywinksNever Too Late 202 [Week ending 7 October] Looking to discuss the latest developments in competition law in the pharma sector? [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 7:13 am by admin
Now, if John Doe owes $1,000 to Jane Doe and then makes a Promissory Note in favour of Jane Doe payable at some future time (e.g. 1 year), then this Promissory Note will be valid as having valuable consideration. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 7:39 am by admin
Once again, Jane Doe has two options: endorse the Promissory Note in blank or specially. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Matthew Kahn
Section 1 of the amendment clearly states that if a president dies, resigns or is removed by Congress, “the Vice President shall become President. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:01 am by Max Factor
Jane is then told that she may invest anywhere from $1 to $10 of her money with Lev. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 12:13 am
As a reminder, the following italicized questions come from Jane C. [read post]
30 May 2022, 8:25 am by Eric Goldman
Courts in the Fifth Circuit consider: (1) the type of mark allegedly infringed; (2) the similarity between the two marks; (3) the similarity of the products or services; (4) the identity of retail outlets and purchasers; (5) the identity of the advertising media used; (6) the defendant’s intent; and (7) actual confusion. [read post]
7 May 2021, 10:17 am by luiza
  While the agency made a $3 million award in April, the most recent one before that was a $250,000 award in September. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 1:34 pm
As a reminder, the following italicized questions come from Jane C. [read post]