Search for: "Jay Tidmarsh"
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2023, 2:04 pm
Jay Tidmarsh, Notre Dame Law School Panel II—Outcomes & Remedies: History & Judicial Review of the Administrative Procedure Act Prof. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 9:52 am
The new Courts Law essay comes from Jay Tidmarsh (Notre Dame) reviewing Helen Hershkoff & Luke Norris, The Oligarchic Courthouse: Jurisdiction, Corporate Power, and Democratic Decline, Mich. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
Jay Tidmarsh Since Robert Cover’s 1981 article, many (including me) have accepted on faith that jurisdictional redundancy is a good thing. [read post]
27 May 2022, 3:30 am
Jay Tidmarsh Because 98% of civil litigation occurs in state court, we procedure scholars can be criticized for our myopic focus on procedures in federal courts. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 12:08 pm
DRE]The Selden Society with the Four Inns of Court presents The Fire Courts: Successfully Delivering Justice in a Time of Plague and Fire, by Jay Tidmarsh, Notre Dame Law School, 21 October 2020, 5.30pm. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 5:30 am
Twelve Tables Press is co-owned by Steve Errick, a legal industry publisher and Chief Operation Officer of Fastcase, Larry Selby, a former American Law Media (ALM) Vice President of Research Solutions, and Jay Tidmarsh, a Professor of Law at Notre Dame Law School. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 9:45 am
Now on the Courts Law section of JOTWELL is Jay Tidmarsh’s essay, The Negotiation Class Action. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 8:49 am
The new Courts Law essay comes from Jay Tidmarsh (Notre Dame), reviewing Francis E. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 3:30 am
Jay Tidmarsh A common criticism of modern academic legal writing is its lack of usefulness in the real world of practice. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 6:03 am
Today on the Courts Law section of JOTWELL is Jay Tidmarsh’s essay Building a Better Mousetrap. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 6:53 am
The new Courts Law essay comes form Jay Tidmarsh (Notre Dame), reviewing Christopher Hodges & Stefaan Vogt, Delivering Collective Redress: New Technologies (Hart 2018), which explores the European search for alternative approaches to collective litigation and redress. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 3:30 am
Jay Tidmarsh A series of mostly hostile Supreme Court and court of appeals decisions, combined with the Court’s unwillingness to rein in boilerplate arbitration clauses in consumer agreements, has led a number of scholars to proclaim that class actions are dead, or at least dying. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 3:30 am
Jay Tidmarsh A series of mostly hostile Supreme Court and court of appeals decisions, combined with the Court’s unwillingness to rein in boilerplate arbitration clauses in consumer agreements, has led a number of scholars to proclaim that class actions are dead, or at least dying. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:58 pm
Now on the Courts Law section of JOTWELL is Jay Tidmarsh’s essay, “And the Deposition Goes to the Gentleman in the Blue Pinstripe Suit. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 5:52 am
The new Courts Law essay comes from Jay Tidmarsh (Notre Dame), reviewing Ronen Avraham and William Hubbard, Procedural Flexibility in Three Dimensions (unpublished draft, coming to SSRN soon), proposing markets in procedural entitlements (such as depositions or words in briefs). [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 3:30 am
Jay Tidmarsh A burgeoning procedural literature explores the power of parties to alter the procedural entitlements of the civil-justice system by means of contractual agreement and the limits of that power. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 2:30 am
Jay Tidmarsh said yes in an article published in the University of Chicago Law Review. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 8:38 am
Now on the Courts Law section of JOTWELL is Jay Tidmarsh’s essay, Discovery Costs and Default Rules. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:33 am
The new Courts Law essay comes from Jay Tidmarsh (Notre Dame), reviewing Brian T. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
Jay Tidmarsh In One-Way Fee Shifting After Summary Judgment, Brian Fitzpatrick and his student, Cameron Norris, address what has been the dominant impulse in federal procedural reform for the past thirty-five years: reducing cost and delay in civil litigation. [read post]
