Search for: "Jerry W Washington" Results 61 - 80 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2023, 5:14 am by Eric Fruits
” Preemption of state policies: “But when Washington withdrew, California rode in with its own regime. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 6:24 am
Hogan, whose partners earn at least $725,000 a year [15], just released a statement on January 25, 2007 announcing that the starting salary for a first-year associate would increase to $145,000. [16]   For comparison, consider that District Court judges who are usually appointed in their 50s [17] and therefore have significantly more hard-earned experience than your average fresh-faced law school graduate - earn only $165,000 per year. [18]  Previous to entering law school, this… [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:03 pm by Adam Thierer
Listen to Jerry Brito’s “Surprisingly Free” podcast discussion with Tim Wu here. (#2) Kevin Kelly – What Technology Wants Kevin Kelly has written a terrifically interesting book that is actually two books in one. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); accord Gall v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); accord Gall v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 11:45 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Trailer: https://youtu.be/VHmn9U3c0zA Shock and Awe (2018) A group of journalists covering President George W. [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:22 am
With that answer, Souter does not directly refute commentary that he waited to retire until a president more to his liking than George W. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
 The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington is also one of the plaintiffs:  Even though it is entirely exempt from the regulation (that is, its employees are not entitled to contraception coverage), it alleges that its religious exercise is burdened because it is the sponsor of a church plan used by some of the other plaintiffs. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am by Eugene Volokh
In In re Marriage of Suggs, the Washington Supreme Court set aside a civil harassment restraining order that barred "knowingly and willfully making invalid and unsubstantiated allegations or complaints to third parties which are designed for the purpose of annoying, harassing, vexing, or otherwise harming [plaintiff] and for no lawful purpose. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Paula Mitchell
Capital punishment in the United States is often considered in terms of its constitutional vulnerability. [read post]