Search for: "John/Jane Does 1-20"
Results 81 - 100
of 137
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2013, 6:16 am
Table of Contents Section 1: Use of Fictitious Names or Pseudonyms in Connecticut Courts Table 1: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Civil Matters Table 2: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Summary Process Matters Section 2: Use of Fictitious Business Names in Connecticut Table 3: Use of Fictitious Business Names Section 3: Criminal Impersonation in Connecticut Published: 6/6/2013 9:20 AM [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:37 pm
A typical exception for oil and gas lease might read: “Oil and Gas Lease from John Doe and Jane Doe to ABC Oil Co., dated May 16, 2012 and filed May 18, 2012 as Reception No. 152637 of Summit County Records. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:13 pm
FERN HART, individually; MICHAEL KENNEDY, individually, and JANE and JOHN DOES 1-20, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants, Appellees, Cross-Appellants. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
These excerpts are part of a larger article, “Closing Pandora’s Box: Speculative Invoicing and Opportunism in File Sharing” from the Fall Issue, Volume 12-1, of the Wake Forest Journal of Business & Intellectual Property Law. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:42 am
When it comes to understanding the potential risks, costs, and advantages of the various investment “products” offered today, a prudent investor must begin by understanding the role of the person from whom they are purchasing the investment. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:10 am
Jane Hull disagreed with the board and allowed the execution to proceed. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Mapping Russian Twitter, by John Kelly, Vladimir Barash, Karina Alexanyan, Bruce Etling, Robert Faris, Urs Gasser, and John Palfrey. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
L.J. 901-942 (2011).Stensvaag, John-Mark. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:46 am
McKenna of Woodhard, Emhardt, Moriarity, McNett & Henry, LLP Defendant: Shannon Bartnick, Chris Bartnick, John and Jane Does 1-15 Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Trademark Deceptive Consumer Sales Activities under Ind. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 7:02 pm
” “The Free for Life” In this reality-based comedy, John and Jane Q. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:16 am
And he does… straight off a cliff. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 6:55 am
The right to be forgotten is now found in Article 17, the right to object to processing is contained in Articles 19 and 20, and the Article 79 fines have been lowered from 3% to 1% of annual global revenues. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
Jane Fae, a specialist in the Obscene Publications Act, comments on the case here. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
L.J. 1-95 (2010/2011). [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
Essays by Mary Jane Angelo, Amelia Timbers,Matthew J. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 2:36 am
Meaning it may not be gibberish, but it’s close to it and misses out the following situations: 1. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:06 am
Woodworth v Janes, 2 Johns Cas 417, 423 [NY 1801] [parties in equal fault have no rights in equity]; Sebring v Rathbun, 1 Johns Cas 331, 332 [NY 1800] [where both parties are equally culpable, courts will not "interpose in favor of either"]). [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
Basic Law for Web Designers No 1: Introduction to Contract Law [By: Jane Lambert |In: Commercial Law & Contracts, Tech Law] 18. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 8:00 am
So, on the very same day that blink-182 released its Up All Night fan montage video on YouTube, “rewarding its fans for copyright infringement,” it also filed a federal trademark infringement lawsuit against John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and XYZ Company in US District Court for the District of Massachusetts. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 7:39 am
If John Doe endorses the Promissory Note in favour of Jane Doe and delivers it to her (i.e. a special endorsement), then Jane Doe’s endorsement is necessary to further negotiate the Promissory Note (i.e. transfer it under the Bills of Exchange Act) to another person. [read post]
