Search for: "John Culhane" Results 241 - 260 of 266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2009, 10:35 am
Among other things, Culhane observes, this lawsuit challenges the claim of neutrality:As the complaint states, DOMA forces the state to discriminate against its own citizens â€â [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 12:02 pm
" (H.R. 2517 / S.1102)His presidential memorandum is here.Legal Commentary (last updated 06/20/09)06/20/09 WordinEdgewise, by law professor John Culhane:On June 24th, Culhane will join Stacey Sobel in a debate on how the Obama Administration has addressed, or failed to address, LGBT issues. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 12:30 pm by Michael Ginsborg
It's exactly the kind of alternative that law professor John Culhane thought was available.DOMA - Gill v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 5:59 am
I have also offered Professor John Culhane's conjecture on why ADF might, by its lights, consider the opportunity "good lawyering. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 5:02 pm by Michael Ginsborg
The law would take effect at the conclusion of the Congressional review period, which lasts for 30 legislative days following the Mayor’s signature. 12/15/09 WordinEdgewise, by law professor John Culhane: Expect marriage equality to be realized in D.C. by late January. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 10:44 am by Michael Ginsborg
Schwarzenegger Trial Re-enactment, 01/21/10 Pam's House Blend [See a related post by law professor John Culhane.]Sharon Jayson, Same-sex couples can be effective parents, researchers find, 01/21/10 USA TodaySarah Wildman, Children Speak for Same-Sex Marriage, 01/20/10 NY TimesCommentaryRobert Cruickshank, How Today’s Supreme Court Decision Affects The Marriage Equality Movement, 01/21/10 Courage Campaign's Prop 8 Trial TrackerAttorney Chris Geidner, Justice Thomas… [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 12:22 pm by Michael Ginsborg
Law professor John Culhane believes that support from younger Americans will ultimately transform public perception of same-sex marriage. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 7:07 am by Mark J. Furletti
  My colleagues John Culhane and Tristram Wolf will touch on the legal merits of this position and other LGBT issues in an upcoming webinar on the Supreme Court’s same-sex marriage decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 8:33 am by John Culhane
John Culhane is to be commended for bringing together such an illustrious group of contributors to address public health, an issue that has been neglected in law schools. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:47 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary on the cases and oral arguments come from Noah Feldman for Bloomberg View, Marci Hamilton at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, David Gans at the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, Eric Segall at ACSblog, John Culhane at Politico Magazine, Bob Tuttle and Ira Lupu at Cornerstone, Adam Winkler at ACSblog, Joseph Mansilla at Adventures in Doctrinal Wonderland, David Upham at The Public Discourse, Karl Laird at Oxford Human Rights Hub,… [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary on the case comes from John Culhane at Politico Magazine, Roger Pilon in an op-ed for The Orange County Register, and Brian Miller in an op-ed for Forbes. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 10:11 am by Michael Ginsborg
.'s marriage-equality law marks what law professor John Culhane calls a "another milestone on the superhighway to full equality. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Culhane from Penn’s  School of Social Policy & Practice. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 12:18 pm by Michael Ginsborg
(Minnesotan Independent)(At this site, law professor John Culhane has offered his ideas on the appropriate scope of exemptions for religious organizations.)Law professor Dale Carpenter also testified:He argued that marriage is a powerful legal institution that encourages healthy, monogamous relationships — whether gay or straight. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:56 pm by John Culhane
John Culhane, Professor of Law, Widener University, I would not want to be a student sitting in your class where I’d be fed an assortment of lies served up by a biased, or should I say prejudice, bigot! [read post]