Search for: "John Doe Holder" Results 1 - 20 of 1,730
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1]  Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3]  One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
That does not suggest laissez faire in the style of Milton Friedman--it does suggest that public policy creates guard rails and expectations but does not drive micro-decision making. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 5:17 am by Michael C. Dorf
Consider 64-year-old Victoria Clark, who portrays a teenager inhabiting a prematurely aging body in Kimberly Akimbo, Tom Hanks as a boy within a man's body in Big, or John Travolta and Nicolas Cage trading faces in Face/Off. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 6:08 pm
It signaled what appeared to be the ending of a long arc of development with the abandonment of the project to produce a Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights (the “Norms”).[1] It was also the year that saw the announcement of the appointment of John Ruggie as Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprise… [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm by Josh Blackman
In October 2021, Justice Barrett wrote her influential concurrence in John Does 1-3 v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:16 pm by Alexis Hancock
The most used example is verification that the credential holder is over 21, without showing anything else about the holder, such as their name and address that appear on the [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
Moreover, the term “shall” at the beginning of the first sentence reflects that the obligation is binding on Canada and does not give space for discretionary application of the rule. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
The court held that Section 3 did notapply because the Presidency, which Section 3 does notmention by name, is not an “office . . . under the United3Cite as: 601 U. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 6:08 am
  2   A First Reading of Definitive Text: The UNHRC Endorsement Resolution and the Endorsed UNGP       The Guiding Principles were unveiled in two stages, separated by about half a year, by John G. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Much of the research he presents "has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]