Search for: "John Doe Inc" Results 121 - 140 of 5,498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2013, 5:05 am by Susan Brenner
Yahoo does not claim ownership of Content you submit or make available for inclusion on the Service. . . . [read post]
27 May 2009, 9:59 pm
" at last week's BIO International Convention, a panel consisting of Anne Dollard, the Deputy General Counsel and Chief Patent Counsel for Takeda San Francisco; Thomas Kim, Senior Director of Intellectual Property for VGX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Jane Gunnison of Ropes & Gray LLP; John Tessensohn of Shusaku Yamamoto Patent Law Offices; and Dr. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:25 am by Joshua Smeltzer
One of the most powerful tools in the Internal Revenue Service arsenal is the John Doe summons. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 5:34 am
Yesterday the Appellate Division, First Department reversed a lower court ruling and dismissed a breach of fiduciary duty claim against the New York Stock Exchange and its Chief Executive Officer John Thain - Hyman v New York Stock Exch., Inc., 2007 NY Slip Op 09909. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 10:08 pm
Plaintiff sued Defendant, American Express, and John Doe/ABC Co. to recover payments made by customer’s credit cards. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 2:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Among the numerous companies hit with #MeToo-related management liability lawsuits in the late 2017 to early 2019 time frame was the national pizza restaurant company Papa John’s International Inc. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:57 pm
If there is a separate brief for Appellee "John Does 2-10", the ILB has not yet received a copy; other than that, the list should now be complete. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 12:17 pm
Why does Rhonda Bentzen leave a gap in her LinkedIn profile omitting the fact that she was affiliated with Structured Financial Associates, Inc. between Canada and Strategic Capital? [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 4:01 am
Cohen agreed with Westchester County that the petition improperly names John Does "1" through "100" as Petitioners.The court said that although CPLR 1024 provides for the naming of unknown parties as defendants in an action, it does not provide for the naming of unidentified Petitioners in an Article 78 proceeding.The judge also faulted the Association for failing to come forward with any statutory authority for naming unknown Petitioners, merely… [read post]