Search for: "John Doe No. 142" Results 61 - 80 of 162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
When that does work, the second option is to move them to a law-free, court-free zone, such as GTMO. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Even if the lawyer is aware of the constitutional and international law that supports the sole authority of the ancestral law, the lawyer will feel bound to say the law does not matter given the legal system’s prior suppression of its existence. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:47 am by Amira Mikhail
Article 142 of the Code of Criminal Procedure permits 15 days detention without charge and an extension of two additional 15 day periods. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:47 am by Amira Mikhail
Article 142 of the Code of Criminal Procedure permits 15 days detention without charge and an extension of two additional 15 day periods. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 8:31 pm
Frith Excellent Blog Review by fellow NY Personal Injury Lawyer John … Medical malpractice: suits in jeopardy? [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:02 am by John L. Welch
Dep’t of the Interior, 142 USPQ 506 (TTAB 1964), where the Board reversed a refusal to register a logo of the National Park Service. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:41 pm by Mark Walsh
This is a tradition, and it does not typically include justices. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 2:47 pm
But, as the oral argument developed on Wednesday, Chief Justice John G. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Can this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Supreme Court Justice John Marshall Harlan was known as “the Great Dissenter” in the history of jurisprudence. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:15 am by Phil Dixon
For more information on issues surrounding restoration of firearms rights after a conviction, see John Rubin, Relief From a Criminal Conviction, Firearm Rights After a Felony Conviction (UNC School of Government 2021). [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am by Marty Lederman
*Second, Gorsuch recognizes that "the fact that a third party has access to or possession of your papers and effects does not necessarily eliminate your interest in them. [read post]