Search for: "John Doe W" Results 81 - 100 of 3,481
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2023, 3:07 pm by Stephen Halbrook
Neither does Rahimi's application of Bruen create a "regulatory straitjacket" as the Government claims. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:08 am by Eugene Volokh
Doe, defendant Jane Doe had filed a Title IX complaint against fellow Tulane student John Doe: Both Jane and another student (not a party to the case), Sue Roe, had "reported having consensual sex with [John], falling asleep, and waking up to him engaging in sexual activity. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:02 am by Bill Marler
Sources, Characteristics, and Identification E. coli is an archetypal commensal bacterial species that lives in mammalian intestines. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:12 pm by Guest Author
Writing for SCOTUSblog this week, John Elwood highlighted a fascinating piece of news in another Chevron case that could impact Loper Bright: The Court moved up its consideration of Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:23 am by centerforartlaw
”[25] The loan policy limits the lending or moving of the works, only allowing a loan if the exhibition makes an important contribution to scholarship, if the painting plays an important role in the exhibition, if it does not disrupt the educational programs at the Barnes, and if it is in stable condition to travel.[26] No more than 20 paintings are allowed to be out of the Foundation simultaneously and for no more than 12 mo [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Does the group guidance inappropriately downplay the importance of an “agreement” in group formation? [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:05 am by Eugene Volokh
" … [But] "[w]hile this Commonwealth places great importance on biological ties, it does not do so to the extent that the biological parent's right to custody will trump the best interests of the child. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 12:04 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Bush Administration and for John McCain's 2008 presidential campaign). [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:17 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court emphasized that the fact that the organization's intent was "to exercise a coercive impact on [the broker] does not remove" the First Amendment's protections. [read post]