Search for: "John Does 1 through 11" Results 41 - 60 of 2,339
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2012, 1:39 pm
Third, it argues that the subpoena was an overly broad “John Doe” subpoena. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 12:37 pm by Bill Marler
In late 2019, an outbreak of E. coli O103 in Iowa was linked to clover sprouts served at Jimmy John’s restaurants.[8] On or around December 19, 2019, Jimmy John’s, LLC was informed that sandwiches sold at its restaurants were the suspected source of the outbreak, and on December 23, 2019, Inspire Brands was contacted by the Iowa Department of Inspections and Appeals to inform them of the sprouts-related outbreak.[9] Neither Inspire Brands nor Jimmy… [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am by Eugene Volokh
" 1 John Adams, A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States 376 (Philadelphia, William Cobbett 1797). [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 11:59 am
NLRB Law Memo 11/17/2006 by LawMemo - World's Best. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 9:05 am by Guest Author
Because section 706(2) does not tell courts to give a remedy of vacatur as setting aside, that provision does not call for a universal remedy. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 2:21 am
The University seeks the Court's permission to serve the attached interrogatories on Plaintiffs and conduct telephonic depositions of the individuals who investigated the seventeen John Does named in this lawsuit to determine 1) what their investigative practices are and 2) whether they have any additional information with which to identify the John Does. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:34 am
Salviatus represents the traditional Christian view. 1. [read post]
22 May 2011, 6:08 pm
Today's Gospel reading was from the famous (or, depending on how you interpret it, infamous) fourteenth chapter of John, verses 1 through 14:Jesus’ Parting Words to His Disciples14:1 “Do not let your hearts be distressed. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:03 am by paperstreet
In re Grand Jury Subpoena, Case no. 11-12268 (11th Cir. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm by Guest Author
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,[1] recently argued in the Supreme Court, mainly concerns the limitations period for judicial review of agency decisions. [read post]