Search for: "John Does 1-30" Results 81 - 100 of 3,150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2022, 10:35 pm by Josh Blackman
Milligan is the most important shadow docket entry since John Does 1-3 v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 6:03 pm by Benjamin Justus
John Does 1-30 Filed: 06/30/2016Case No. 1:16-cv-01688 Criminal Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 10:49 am
The statute in question, from the state of Washington, guaranteed women and minors just over 30 cents per hour. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:13 am by John L. Welch
The Board affirmed a refusal to register the logo shown immediately below, for "clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts, tank tops and tops," under Sections 1, 2, and 45, finding it to be "primarily an ornamental feature of the goods" that "does not function as a trademark for the goods. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:25 am by Gritsforbreakfast
• Allows medium-risk and high-risk prisoners to earn time credits at a rate of 30% and 20% while they are successfully completing recidivism reduction programming, but does not allow them to cash in this credit until the risk assessment tool shows that they are a low-risk of recidivating. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 1:02 pm
 In the Matter of the Adoption of John Doe and James Doe came before the Court on a petition for adoption of two foster children by a gay man who had raised the children since 2004. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 12:56 pm
In the complaint, there are causes of action for: 1. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 7:07 pm
John Bellamy kept journals. [read post]
However, prosecutors are beginning to use “John Doe” warrants as a way to get around the statute of limitations. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 12:23 am
While more accurate than John Simpson's earlier inaccurate ramblings on the re-examof the WARF patents, IPBiz adds some text. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 8:10 am
October 30, 2018 - 1 PM: Topiclear, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm by Guest Author
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,[1] recently argued in the Supreme Court, mainly concerns the limitations period for judicial review of agency decisions. [read post]