Search for: "John Does 1-31" Results 201 - 220 of 1,687
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Kate Waldock
§ 1102(a)(1). [12] See In re Johns-Manville Corp., 26 B.R. 919 (Bankr. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 6:00 am by Amanda Sloat
What Does it Mean to Prorogue Parliament? [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” In an article available at SSRN, John Vlahoplus looks at last term’s decision in Sessions v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm
The national security exception is a concept in need of a workable and flexible standard to address concerns in an age of hegemonic rivalry.1 National security is no longer solely relegated to the realm of armed conflict; concerns are now focused on economic and technological security. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:38 am by John L. Welch
The construction of applicant’s term MOTIONPOWER is similar, and consumers are likely to perceive applicant’s designation as merely descriptive when used in connection with goods or services that feature the generation of power from motion.Of course, whether Applicant is the first or only user of the term does not affect the Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness determination.And so the Board affirmed the refusal.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 2:11 pm by Patti Waller
On November 27, 2007,[1] a health department officer in central Massachusetts contacted the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) to report a Listeria infection in an 87-year-old man, later identified as John Powers. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
  Its genesis is John Ruggie's closing remarks delivered at the close of the 3rd Forum on Business and Human Rights held in Geneva 2-3 December 2014. [read post]
25 May 2017, 6:10 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Since the first deadline for this revised 2017 EEO-1 Report won’t be until March 31, 2018, contractors can simply sit back and patiently wait for the OMB or the EEOC to take action. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:43 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
On August 31, 2004, in F. v. the United Kingdom (Application no. 17341/03, June 22, 2004), the application of a gay Iranian man was declared inadmissible both in relation to violations of Articles 3 and 8 ECHR. [read post]
25 May 2009, 7:15 am
No. 31 September Term 2003 (Motion for Stay of Execution and Supporting Exhibits, Exhibit 9, Appendix B, filed June 1, 2004, motion denied, State v. [read post]